Oh sorry, it's okay for non-Muslims who believe what you believe to attack Islam, but it's not okay for non-Muslims who believe differently than you to defend it, because if we do, we are offended and clearly wrong. Clearly.

Yea, I actually know a few Muslims that weren't born in America and came from Middle-Eastern countries like Iran, and they would completely disagree with you that Islam is the problem. They think extremists are a serious problem, but not Islam. It doesn't even make sense to say Islam is the problem, but to admit that most Muslims are fine, and just a select few interpret it wrong. That happens with every religion.

Sorry, I didn't even want to respond to this post but the hypocrisy in this paragraph made it so I couldn't resist. It's so easy to dismiss others' opinions by pretending that your opinions are fact. It's just hypocritical to do so.

I just don't even get the logic behind this Islam is bad bull****. Are we going to say that the phrase "An eye for an eye" is bad because someone goes around stabbing people's eyes by illogically interpreting it literally? You can blame culture, society, governance, decades and decades of history, especially history within the Islam itself and the tribal fighting. But it's wrong to argue that the most notable correlation - the causation of extremism - is Islam itself, when 99% of Muslims are not extremists. When Muslims in America are nothing like Muslims in ISIS, you have to look at what actually causes that difference. It's unscientific to ignore the fact that the difference ratio between "good" Muslims and "bad" Muslims is huge. Look a little deeper and find out what actually causes someone to join ISIS or other extremist groups, rather than making the easy conclusion to a situation that, like it or not, is far more complex than many people would like to believe.