![]() |
|
|
| Poll Results: Should an Admin be allowed to own a gang? | |||
| 59.52% |
Yes.
|
||
| 40.48% |
No.
|
||
| Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Topic Tools |
|
02-01-2013
|
31 | |
|
all killa no filla
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: t(^.^t)
Posts: 1,111
|
if admins are allowed to own gangs, fine. but there is NO REASON at all, they should be allowed to be on both accounts (admin and non-admin) at same time and no reason any admin should be allowed to be in a gang (ANY GANG) WHILE ON an admin account. make that illegal, boom, no abuse. |
|
|
02-01-2013
|
32 |
|
Divided Soul
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 814
|
I agree with this in a way, sure I'm all for a social owner or just to have fun but competitive leaves room for the temptation which was done so by celestial in the past while fighting them. Another admin vouching for another referring to John may not always be looked toward as true, due to the lack of credibility in the past with administration. The general population can decide this without motivation from you. |
|
02-01-2013
|
33 |
|
Love to all
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,406
|
I don't think this is an issue of staff owning guilds. I think the issue here is when staff abuse their powers to help them take towers. That's obviously not right, and should be frowned upon. Report the staff members who do this. Email [email protected] with the subject "Staff Abuse - (person's name here)," and provide as much information as possible. Them being "too popular" is a silly argument though. When they aren't working, they deserve the same rights as a normal player. Especially since they help the server for free. |
|
02-01-2013
|
34 | |
|
299,792,458 m/s
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 3,581
|
|
|
|
02-01-2013
|
35 | |
|
all killa no filla
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: t(^.^t)
Posts: 1,111
|
|
|
|
02-01-2013
|
36 |
|
299,792,458 m/s
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 3,581
|
|
|
02-01-2013
|
37 |
|
all killa no filla
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: t(^.^t)
Posts: 1,111
|
|
|
02-01-2013
|
38 |
|
299,792,458 m/s
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 3,581
|
|
|
02-01-2013
|
39 | |
|
all killa no filla
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: t(^.^t)
Posts: 1,111
|
John, you dont base competitively, and when you do, its for a very short period of time. Now, an admin who does base competitively, this is too much potential for abuse. |
|
|
02-01-2013
|
40 | |
|
299,792,458 m/s
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 3,581
|
|
|
|
02-01-2013
|
41 | |
|
all killa no filla
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: t(^.^t)
Posts: 1,111
|
and they have been contacted, multiple times. problem is, as admins, its easier for you to get away with this sh!t, ESPECIALLY if you are doing what I explained. I know what goes on, most dont or arent even aware of it. I saw it everyday in sK, gimme a break dude. |
|
|
02-01-2013
|
42 |
|
299,792,458 m/s
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 3,581
|
|
|
02-01-2013
|
43 | |
|
all killa no filla
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: t(^.^t)
Posts: 1,111
|
|
|
|
02-01-2013
|
44 | |
|
amidoinitrite?
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,484
|
Pixel Ravenix was removed early last month for other reasons. OT: If it's just an Admin basing on his iOS with no influence of his/her staff account then I don't see why not. I spend a lot of time on my iPod account as my PC isn't available to me at that point in time. If it's having both iOS and staff accounts online while basing then yes, that is a problem and it actually goes against PR guidelines. They clearly state that "Your staff tag is not to be abused in a base, doing so will involve a removal from the team", obviously, if this is happening, refer to the paragraph above. |
|
|
02-01-2013
|
45 | |
|
299,792,458 m/s
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 3,581
|
Back on topic : I still see no reason of why a staff would not be owning a gang. //Edit : forgot the 'not' |
|