Government Shutdown - 2

Talon · 10-10-2013

The US government structure is flawed as it is, throw two opposing left-wing and right-wing citizen-elected parties and it all goes to **** eventually.

Posted by Rexx

Tell that to the jews during the ww2.

Two entirely different scenarios.

Rexx · 10-10-2013

Posted by Talon

The US government structure is flawed as it is, throw two opposing left-wing and right-wing citizen-elected parties and it all goes to **** eventually.

Two entirely different scenarios.

So you can only move on with life in certain scenarios? Next time you should be more specific when you make bold and broad statements.

Nyte* · 10-10-2013

It could be worse, we could be building entire cities and having no one moving into them (YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE)

Blueh · 10-10-2013

I think the whole idea of political parties was horrible from the start, and the founding father's even realized this. Canadates and congress don't work to serve the people, but to appease their party. The democrats are trying to impress their party, and the republicans are trying to impress their party. What you get is people taking sides and not really working for a common benefit. God bless the moderates who can really see things from both perspectives and try to find things that will benefit as many as possible, but it's the radicals (not just the Republicans) who slow down progress. They're so caught up in this strong opposition towards the other party that they forget it's the people they're supposed to be working for, not their party.

After watching Obama's speech over the shut down I really didn't like how he took the opportunity to glamorize the democratic party. It just seemed like he went on and on about how this was all the republicans fault, and how democrats are the good guys here when there is plenty of controversial issues the democrats created.

Instead of showing how one party is better than another because of the actions of another, we should be showing just how bad political parties have become over the years and why they aren't good at all for the government at all. The senators and representatives shouldn't be tied to a specific party, but tied to their state's interests and the general interest for the nation's needs as a whole. This is the way it was intended to be, and this is the way it should be.

MrSimons · 10-10-2013

Posted by hosler

blame the republican house majority for this

I think you're an idiot, and your opinion sucks.

Rockson · 10-10-2013

I'd like to counter with it's not the republicans faults. If you haven't been brainwashed by the media, you'd know Obama being reelected was the worst possible thing for us. His first term not only doubled our debt, he never got a single budget passed. Try blaming the republicans for not passing his budget? Democrats also would vote against him unanimously. I'd like to keep talking about how Obama is terrible, but the list is endless. You just need to find an unbiased source on politics.

twilit · 10-10-2013

Posted by hosler

blame the republican house majority for this

such ignorance.

Platinum · 10-10-2013

Great, let's have one party/group leading America and see where that gets you.

Look, the reason why there are two groups in parliament is obvious, one side proposes the ideas and looks at the benefits. The other group examine the ideas and look at the negatives.
AKA they both think they are the geniuses and the conflicting party is idiotic.

hosler · 10-10-2013

Posted by MrSimons

I think you're an idiot, and your opinion sucks.

I think you dont know jack about anything and just spout out whatever you hear your parents say.

Talon · 10-10-2013

Posted by Rexx

So you can only move on with life in certain scenarios? Next time you should be more specific when you make bold and broad statements.

Yes, of course you can only move on in certain scenarios. That was implied. Next time don't take everything anyone says so literally.

Blueh · 10-10-2013

Posted by Platinum

Great, let's have one party/group leading America and see where that gets you.

Look, the reason why there are two groups in parliament is obvious, one side proposes the ideas and looks at the benefits. The other group examine the ideas and look at the negatives.
AKA they both think they are the geniuses and the conflicting party is idiotic.

One party/political group would be disastrous as well. No other voices will be able to be heard, and would be more of an oligarchy by that group to take complete control of the government. Tyranny by the masses. Likewise, a two party system is also disastrous. It does not place a check on the other party. It creates a conflict that divides the nation's beliefs which leads to a whole set of domestic issues. A representative should represent the people, not the party.

Rexx · 10-10-2013

Posted by Talon

Yes, of course you can only move on in certain scenarios. That was implied. Next time don't take everything anyone says so literally.

I don't see how its implied at all :l

PoeticFolly · 10-11-2013

Murica.

Talon · 10-11-2013

Posted by PoeticFolly

Murica.

**** you

PoeticFolly · 10-11-2013

[10:33:03 PM] Talon: 'murica is getting old as **** too
[10:33:09 PM] Chris: i say it sometimes in sarcasm
[10:33:14 PM] Talon: ****ing I swear if someone posted 'murica on the government shutdown threa
[10:33:17 PM] Chris: lmfao
[10:33:24 PM] Talon: i would delete the post and leave them an angry visitor message
[10:33:24 PM] Chris: i only say lmfao to you
[10:33:27 PM] Chris: hahahahahah
[10:33:50 PM] Talon: ok maybe not because rufus would fire me but still
[10:34:05 PM] Talon: and 'dafuq is this lel'

*I posted murica and linked it to him*

[10:34:29 PM] Talon: you mother****ing twat ****er **** *** dumpster ratchet ***** ******
[10:34:41 PM] Chris: sorry bro-guy
[10:36:05 PM] Talon: ok i left you a ****ing angry visitor message
[10:36:08 PM] Chris: that visitor message
[10:36:11 PM] Chris: is way too intense
[10:36:14 PM] Chris: can you like tone it down please
[10:36:20 PM | Edited 10:36:24 PM] Chris: im literally crying right now lel xd

10-10-2013	18
Nyte* Zone Player Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 697	It could be worse, we could be building entire cities and having no one moving into them (YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE)

10-10-2013	19
Blueh The Orator Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Yes Posts: 3,307	I think the whole idea of political parties was horrible from the start, and the founding father's even realized this. Canadates and congress don't work to serve the people, but to appease their party. The democrats are trying to impress their party, and the republicans are trying to impress their party. What you get is people taking sides and not really working for a common benefit. God bless the moderates who can really see things from both perspectives and try to find things that will benefit as many as possible, but it's the radicals (not just the Republicans) who slow down progress. They're so caught up in this strong opposition towards the other party that they forget it's the people they're supposed to be working for, not their party. After watching Obama's speech over the shut down I really didn't like how he took the opportunity to glamorize the democratic party. It just seemed like he went on and on about how this was all the republicans fault, and how democrats are the good guys here when there is plenty of controversial issues the democrats created. Instead of showing how one party is better than another because of the actions of another, we should be showing just how bad political parties have become over the years and why they aren't good at all for the government at all. The senators and representatives shouldn't be tied to a specific party, but tied to their state's interests and the general interest for the nation's needs as a whole. This is the way it was intended to be, and this is the way it should be.

10-10-2013	21
Rockson Registered User Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Ohio Posts: 412	I'd like to counter with it's not the republicans faults. If you haven't been brainwashed by the media, you'd know Obama being reelected was the worst possible thing for us. His first term not only doubled our debt, he never got a single budget passed. Try blaming the republicans for not passing his budget? Democrats also would vote against him unanimously. I'd like to keep talking about how Obama is terrible, but the list is endless. You just need to find an unbiased source on politics.

10-10-2013	23
Platinum Back from the dead? Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Australia Posts: 2,533	Great, let's have one party/group leading America and see where that gets you. Look, the reason why there are two groups in parliament is obvious, one side proposes the ideas and looks at the benefits. The other group examine the ideas and look at the negatives. AKA they both think they are the geniuses and the conflicting party is idiotic.

10-11-2013	28
PoeticFolly Registered User Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: In your heart Posts: 2,813	Murica.