Title speaks for itself!  

Nothing but less delayers, hackers, laggers, people that decide " Hey lets annoy these guys because we feel like it! " instead of pking like normal people. Otherwise its fine for now.  

Reward tiers need to be completely restructured. People rinse and repeat guilds at 1000 hours because the 1000-hour reward tier makes no sense vs. 5000 and 10,000.
"I can make 5 guilds with 1000 hours and give out 5 different hats to 125 people, or I can get 1 guild to 5000 hours and give out 2 different hats to 75 people." I wonder what people will choose? Structure the rewards so that players will want the reward at 10,000 more than 5000, and 5000 more than 1000. That isn't hard.

There needs to be added incentive to hold towers that makes it a little more fun and rewarding. Getting hours is cool, but I just lead 2 guilds to 1000 hours at Sardon's and never lost the fort a single time while I was online. Voxel had about 4 serious attacks against us. Special Forces has 2 or 3. It was pretty boring. Incentivize attacking and taking forts.
I honestly don't know how they can achieve that, but that's the only way towering can be "fun" to me. Holding forts is boring, taking them is cool. It's as if you're penalized for having a strong guild that holds a fort like Sardon's. People assume they can't take it from you, so nothing happens. You just sit there for 1000 hours straight.

The "ally" system needs to be reworked. I just think it's kind of stupid the way it works now.

Lag blocking needs to be fixed. There are ways to prevent it through clever scripting, staff just haven't done it yet.  

make stefan buy a new wifi port for graal.  

Another chat only for leaders and co-leaders, i'm not intrested in most of the messages and orders get lost in a sea of spam. It's so annoying. A different notification for PM might work to. That way the chitty chat wont mix with lead orders and friends personal messages.  

remove 1k hats & replace it with a different prize. Hat for 5k & Keep 10k mount  

Add a variety of weapons. They can vary from sword, bow bombs, boomerang or any special items that would create some interesting gameplay. Maybe they could add actual weapons that you can buy, customize and improve? More options for earning gralats.

I used to play this game back in 2010-2012. Those were the best years while on Classic. But eventually I lost interest, got bored and now I can't seem to play it anymore considering how boring it is. I would totally play this again if something new comes out and not mounts being released every month for VIP lol.  

We replace the death sounds with Zach Galifianakis screaming and crying from various movie scenes, so it'll encourage more people to tower and PK.  

nothing.  

This is a very good question. You will be surprised, towering has more problems than any other activities on Graal. I would say towering and sparring is the major part of Graal and it's at failure at providing the best.

The problem for towering is, it sort of works like social hierarchy. All the major powers belongs to the leader. It's not fair, only the survival of the fittest survive.

All the other major flaws are similar to this. I have faced these problems exactly a year ago and I couldn't come up with a solution for this. That's the reason I quit helping towers, because I grew up in the individual society and I can't understand this.  

Posted by Thallen

Reward tiers need to be completely restructured. People rinse and repeat guilds at 1000 hours because the 1000-hour reward tier makes no sense vs. 5000 and 10,000.
"I can make 5 guilds with 1000 hours and give out 5 different hats to 125 people, or I can get 1 guild to 5000 hours and give out 2 different hats to 75 people." I wonder what people will choose? Structure the rewards so that players will want the reward at 10,000 more than 5000, and 5000 more than 1000. That isn't hard.

There needs to be added incentive to hold towers that makes it a little more fun and rewarding. Getting hours is cool, but I just lead 2 guilds to 1000 hours at Sardon's and never lost the fort a single time while I was online. Voxel had about 4 serious attacks against us. Special Forces has 2 or 3. It was pretty boring. Incentivize attacking and taking forts.
I honestly don't know how they can achieve that, but that's the only way towering can be "fun" to me. Holding forts is boring, taking them is cool. It's as if you're penalized for having a strong guild that holds a fort like Sardon's. People assume they can't take it from you, so nothing happens. You just sit there for 1000 hours straight.

The "ally" system needs to be reworked. I just think it's kind of stupid the way it works now.

Lag blocking needs to be fixed. There are ways to prevent it through clever scripting, staff just haven't done it yet.

Your starting to sound like a broken record. I do agree with ever thing you said tho. The incentive system stinks and needs an overhaul. I also agree the better part of towering is actually taking the tower vs afking or clicking through spam for hours inside a tower. I would kind of like to see more of a points system rather than the current afk inside the tower system. Get a point for taking a tower, get a point for keeping it for an hour straight. Take a second tower while you are currently holding a tower get 2 points instead of one for taking it.

Maybe they could make a GRP or Guild Reward Points stat that would keep track of points for each player. Those points would be gotten while being online by taking towers,holding towers,and completing other guild activities. Then those points would be spent like currency to buy stuff that you can only get with the guild reward points. Of course there would have to be a store made for this to go to buy the items. I know they had something similar to this before in game,but IMO this would remedy at least some of the towering problems by making it so the individual player is rewarded rather than a whole group of people. You would only get the points,and be able to enter the store while in a guild so it would still encourage players to be in guilds.

I also agree with the ally guilds. We have discussed this before at length in other threads. IMO the best solution is to reduce the number of ally guilds you can have to just one ally guild,and make it so you can only have 1 tag at a time. To help that they would have to go through and remove any inactive guilds with less than a certain minimal hour requirement. TO BE CLEAR I mean guilds with 100 or less tower hours on them. I am not in any way saying to remove dead guilds that have reached 1k. I think they should also raise the price of starting a guild. I realize it may be harder than I think to clean up the towering and guild mess with there being so many players with dozens of guild tags each,and some of them being old guilds that reached 1k or higher that they don't really use but want to keep and there would be to much of an uprising if they tried to remove them. Idk what to do about those.

As for Lag blocking I think if they simply moved things,made wider entrances,or more than one entrance to areas inside towers it would help lag blocking a lot.

Posted by Canis

Another chat only for leaders and co-leaders, i'm not intrested in most of the messages and orders get lost in a sea of spam. It's so annoying. A different notification for PM might work to. That way the chitty chat wont mix with lead orders and friends personal messages.

There's a button for that....It's called the block button. I learned a long time ago from a friend that when there's to much random bs spam chat going on to just block it. Just because you block some one doesn't mean you can't un block them later. I cant count how many times I blocked ppl because they wouldn't shut up. Specially when an admin was hosting events.

Posted by meganey98

This is a very good question. You will be surprised, towering has more problems than any other activities on Graal. I would say towering and sparring is the major part of Graal and it's at failure at providing the best.

The problem for towering is, it sort of works like social hierarchy. All the major powers belongs to the leader. It's not fair, only the survival of the fittest survive.

All the other major flaws are similar to this. I have faced these problems exactly a year ago and I couldn't come up with a solution for this. That's the reason I quit helping towers, because I grew up in the individual society and I can't understand this.

I have to agree. I think they could come up with ways to remove,and share some of the powers the guild owner/leader has. One of the major things I don't like is that the Guild leader gets solo control over who gets the Hats and when they get the hat. If they used the point system I suggested above to help keep track and make requirements that have to be met to get the hat. It would take that responsability away from the guild leader. I don't get why co-leaders don't get the power to promote ppl or give powers to ppl. I do know from experience how ever you have to be careful of what powers you give to whom, because you never know who might decide to go rouge and kick everyone from the guild.  

Posted by ufoburan

Your starting to sound like a broken record.

I mean, I answered the question asked in the thread.  

What would the point of the guild leader be if they had to share powers?  

I tried to block... but everyday is a new bunch of new players, and i'm supossed to block them all? At the end of the week i might have more than a half of classic players blocked. And stuff keeps happening while you spend your time telling who's spamming and who's leading xD
I know, it's a way to solve it, but if the question is 'What do you think can be done to improve towering?', i have to say what i said.  

Posted by Berry

What would the point of the guild leader be if they had to share powers?

Maybe that the leader doesnt need to be on all the time, abd others cab recruit/kick for him?