![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Tools |
|
12-25-2015
|
1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Paris
Posts: 442
|
Graal Classic:People with to high of an ms should not be able to spar?
Do you think people with an to high of an ms should not be allowed to spar?
|
|
12-25-2015
|
2 |
|
all for victory
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Townsville
Posts: 4,222
|
I think people with high ms should be able to spar no matter how annoying they can be, because sometimes it aint their fault its the servers abundance of players fault.
|
|
12-25-2015
|
3 |
|
hi
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 736
|
solved!
|
|
12-25-2015
|
4 |
|
The God
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 159
|
No1 with 30+ms shud be able 2 spar
|
|
12-25-2015
|
5 |
|
Registered Old Person
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Graal City Restaurant
Posts: 4,742
|
*Checks thread title.... "Too" |
|
12-25-2015
|
6 |
|
Python
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,894
|
Just because they win and people suck at vsing it doesn't mean it should be banned.
|
|
12-25-2015
|
7 |
|
The God
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 159
|
|
|
12-25-2015
|
8 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 934
|
The moderate ms lag cap would be great, I think thats 250ms. This would prevent people from using vpns and/or intentionally lagging. I average just under 200 ms, live in Australia and don't have the best wifi (Australian wifi is **** in general.) When I was in Indonesia earlier this year I spiked between 220-300 ms(resort wifi isn't great in third world countries, let alone a remote location.) Don't see why a lag cap for sparring hasn't been implemented, anyone, anywhere can average a reasonable latency. No one likes sparring these well known intentional laggers. Implement this please, thanks!
|
|
|
12-25-2015
|
9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Battle Arena
Posts: 1,550
|
I usually get about 210ms, and I live in England. Though some days, I'll get around 300-320ms. If there's a lag cap, I feel it should be no less than 500ms |
|
12-25-2015
|
10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 934
|
Find that hard to believe considering you live in England, try playing graal without being on other laggy websites like youtube, netflix and so on. 500 ms lmao get real
|
|
12-25-2015
|
11 | |
|
.
Join Date: May 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,071
|
But a lag cap of 250ms seems like the sweet spot for allowing as many people to spar as possible without ruining the spar as much and would be a good thing to add. |
|
|
12-25-2015
|
12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Battle Arena
Posts: 1,550
|
I live pretty near London, the problem is I have a family of 4. My mother works at home and my brother also plays graal. That means there's 3 of us on the internet at the same time. I agree, a lag cap of 250 would make sparring more enjoyable yet would drastically decrease the amount of people actually sparring. It would cut out whole countries from the sparring scene. Thinking about it, 300 would be suitable but nothing less. We want more people to spar, not less. |
|
12-25-2015
|
13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 934
|
|
|
12-25-2015
|
14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Battle Arena
Posts: 1,550
|
I think of myself as a good, respectable sparrer. I don't use lag to win, but I get around 210ms average. Not fair tp stop others like me from sparring. You don't even notice lag till around 300ms |
|
12-25-2015
|
15 | ||
|
all for victory
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Townsville
Posts: 4,222
|
Dont put a limit on people just because the server makes it harder to detect who lags purposely or not. The server needs an upgrade as everyone knows, itll move smoother, less lag. People that have flags in countries you know will have lag or people that have bad wifi can be pretty nice regardless pf their lag so stripping them pf the right to spar cuz of their predicament is pretty dumb. On the other hand a lag limit for events should be a thing like on UN. |
||