Posted by Illusions

What the hell, go to school.

 

Posted by Crono

LEL

You got me. That happened because I was moving sentences around.  

why does this happen to all my threads

just wanted to have a legitimate debate involving a dude who snitched on himself unknowingly  

Posted by Distorted_P2P

why does this happen to all my threads

just wanted to have a legitimate debate involving a dude who snitched on himself unknowingly

He's an idiot. That's all there is to say.  

Posted by Skyzer

You got me. That happened because I was moving sentences around.

happens to the best of us  

He couldn't (or at least shouldn't) even be charged if song lyrics are the only evidence. I'm sure they have talked to other people and built up more evidence than only song lyrics. I haven't followed the case, but I remember hearing a long time ago about someone's song lyrics admitting to a crime... I don't know if this is that exact case or not. I would also think the prosecutors would have a victim. Song lyrics themselves wouldn't get him convicted, let alone charged for a crime. That, and other evidence could, though. If he has ever said that his song lyrics are true or based on something that he did, then that could easily be used against him. Freedom of speech doesn't say that the speech someone does say (in any form of speech) cannot be used against them. It would actually be harder for the prosecutors - unless they had other credible evidence - to use that against him because the defense would have an easy defense against it.  

Posted by PigParty

He couldn't (or at least shouldn't) even be charged if song lyrics are the only evidence. I'm sure they have talked to other people and built up more evidence than only song lyrics. I haven't followed the case, but I remember hearing a long time ago about someone's song lyrics admitting to a crime... I don't know if this is that exact case or not. I would also think the prosecutors would have a victim. Song lyrics themselves wouldn't get him convicted, let alone charged for a crime. That, and other evidence could, though. If he has ever said that his song lyrics are true or based on something that he did, then that could easily be used against him. Freedom of speech doesn't say that the speech someone does say (in any form of speech) cannot be used against them. It would actually be harder for the prosecutors - unless they had other credible evidence - to use that against him because the defense would have an easy defense against it.

posted the indictment earlier in the thread, it's pretty interesting to read