![]() |
|
05-26-2016
|
16 |
|
betflip me nerd
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,012
|
|
|
05-26-2016
|
17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Hampshire, United States
Posts: 3,135
|
|
|
05-26-2016
|
18 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,555
|
why does this happen to all my threads just wanted to have a legitimate debate involving a dude who snitched on himself unknowingly |
|
05-26-2016
|
19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Hampshire, United States
Posts: 3,135
|
|
|
05-26-2016
|
20 |
|
:pluffy:
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,946
|
|
|
05-26-2016
|
21 |
|
PigParty🐷
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PigPen
Posts: 2,913
|
He couldn't (or at least shouldn't) even be charged if song lyrics are the only evidence. I'm sure they have talked to other people and built up more evidence than only song lyrics. I haven't followed the case, but I remember hearing a long time ago about someone's song lyrics admitting to a crime... I don't know if this is that exact case or not. I would also think the prosecutors would have a victim. Song lyrics themselves wouldn't get him convicted, let alone charged for a crime. That, and other evidence could, though. If he has ever said that his song lyrics are true or based on something that he did, then that could easily be used against him. Freedom of speech doesn't say that the speech someone does say (in any form of speech) cannot be used against them. It would actually be harder for the prosecutors - unless they had other credible evidence - to use that against him because the defense would have an easy defense against it.
|
|
05-26-2016
|
22 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,555
|
|
|