Kissing doesn't mean lip kissing, pretty common to kiss people on the cheek and it goes both ways, sounds more like him falsely bragging, you ever see a women complain that Trump randomly kissed her?

"Grab them by the p---y" doesn't mean he did, again, haven't seen anyone complain about that sort of thing besides his false rape accusers.

You honestly think Trump went around kissing and grabbing girls by the p---y and not a single one of them ever complained or spoke out, or you know, nobody else noticed??

Also, at least he does his debates fair and square, Hillary shouldn't have even made it this far.

Email exposing Donna Brazile rigging Sanders v Clinton debate questions also authenticated by Google DKIM


Hillary sent classified email to Chelsea about Greece debt crisis.

Chelsea's husband run hedge fund trading Greek bonds.

Insider trading!

Look, the Clinton Foundation donated $10,000 to the girl who helped them get into Spirit Cooking:
https://i.sli.mg/aRNfvS.png (Unsupported image host)  

Posted by Colin

Also, at least he does his debates fair and square, Hillary shouldn't have even made it this far.

Email exposing Donna Brazile rigging Sanders v Clinton debate questions also authenticated by Google DKIM

Spoiler

I agree. You don't have to tell me twice that Hillary Clinton is corrupt, a liar, and dangerous. The problem is you have to vote for someone else then, and Trump is arguably just as bad as her, but in different ways.

Posted by Colin

Kissing doesn't mean lip kissing, pretty common to kiss people on the cheek and it goes both ways, sounds more like him falsely bragging, you ever see a women complain that Trump randomly kissed her?

"Grab them by the p---y" doesn't mean he did, again, haven't seen anyone complain about that sort of thing besides his false rape accusers.

Kissing them is not described at all as just a friendly kiss on the cheek. I don't even know why I have to explain this. "Grab them by the p---y" doesn't mean he did, but it does suggest he did. I'd like to see proof of how all of his sexual assault (not rape) accusers have been proven false.  

It's been 3-4 decades for these women to take legal action and they decide to do it during the elections. It's unlikely that legal action could be taken against Trump for any of the alleged incidents, at least in part thanks to the statute of limitations on cases of rape and sexual assault that pertain in most US states. Plus there's no evidence that ties into it. In Clinton's case, there's 30K of them and her foreign policies as Secretary of State.


Also Pig, you gotta be idiotic to not think any w-hore would throw themselves onto celebrities. There's women who do that. Just ask any groupie.  

If you guys aren't on the Hillary train yet, this will surely convince you:

 

Posted by Bryan*

It's been 3-4 decades for these women to take legal action and they decide to do it during the elections. It's unlikely that legal action could be taken against Trump for any of the alleged incidents, at least in part thanks to the statute of limitations on cases of rape and sexual assault that pertain in most US states. Plus there's no evidence that ties into it. In Clinton's case, there's 30K of them and her foreign policies as Secretary of State.
Also Pig, you gotta be idiotic to not think any w-hore would throw themselves onto celebrities. There's women who do that. Just ask any groupie.

That's a bull**** excuse to say that someone's credibility is whiped away completely because they didn't come out publicly about a sexual assault on them back then. If you knew anything about sexual crimes, you would know that many victims don't want to come out at all, and that if people do come out, it gives other victims the courage to come out themselves. It's personal, degrading, and something the victim usually wants to avoid. What makes his accusers *****s? Or groupies for that matter? You gotta be idiotic to not think that a pervert in a position of power would use their power over someone else for sexual pleasure. There's rich, powerful men who do that. Just look at Bill Clinton, Roger Ailles, Anthony Weiner, and plenty more.  

It's also common for women to falsely accuse rich and famous men of sexual assault for personal gain, the point is you have no proof or evidence when we have evidence his latest rape accuser lied and was paid off to do so, and we also have evidence about everything we say about Hillary.  

The double standard of these people who act "horrified" by Trump's comments



It's really a joke
The fact that we even compare this kind of stuff to what we're finding out and have known about the Clintons… Come on now  

Spoiler

Posted by PigParty

That's a bull**** excuse to say that someone's credibility is whiped away completely because they didn't come out publicly about a sexual assault on them back then. If you knew anything about sexual crimes, you would know that many victims don't want to come out at all, and that if people do come out, it gives other victims the courage to come out themselves. It's personal, degrading, and something the victim usually wants to avoid. What makes his accusers *****s? Or groupies for that matter? You gotta be idiotic to not think that a pervert in a position of power would use their power over someone else for sexual pleasure. There's rich, powerful men who do that. Just look at Bill Clinton, Roger Ailles, Anthony Weiner, and plenty more.

If these women were subjected to victimization, why haven't they taken legal actions during those 30-40 years and are coming out when he decided to run for president? Put it simply, they seek to destroy his chances and want monetary relief.

If the allegation has merit it will be validated by the evidence. If it does not, it will be debunked. Don’t assume a complainant’s prima facie case is sufficient proof of harassment. Too often people quickly and inappropriately rush to judgment, declaring harassment exists before the facts are known, the evidence is assessed, and a proper determination is made. It is frighteningly easy for a clever woman to provoke, distort & invent an entire harassment case against a man.

Pig, you must be those people who don't believe having evidence is sufficient enough to back up a claim. Relying too much on statements rather than fact-processing investigations. Go drown in corn oil and roast yourself.


Calling it a day, good night noobs.  

Posted by PigParty

That's a bull**** excuse to say that someone's credibility is whiped away completely because they didn't come out publicly about a sexual assault on them back then. If you knew anything about sexual crimes, you would know that many victims don't want to come out at all, and that if people do come out, it gives other victims the courage to come out themselves. It's personal, degrading, and something the victim usually wants to avoid. What makes his accusers *****s? Or groupies for that matter? You gotta be idiotic to not think that a pervert in a position of power would use their power over someone else for sexual pleasure. There's rich, powerful men who do that. Just look at Bill Clinton, Roger Ailles, Anthony Weiner, and plenty more.

That's just the biggest get out of jail free card ever. You're literally giving every excuse as to why the victim IS RIGHT 100%. Using the logic that they can just come out 10 years later when the time is coincidentally the most opportune and that they didn't do this earlier because "many victims don't come out" then how is it even possible that they're proved wrong? I could pull some **** and say my dad beat me 14 years ago but I didn't want to come out then, but now that he's running for office I activate my trap card. Nobody could come and prove it wrong, and society today swings to the "guilty until proven innocent" mentality due to the media. I've never seen "victims" so malicious in my life, much less the sheep that blindly follow them.  

Posted by Bryan*

Spoiler

If these women were subjected to victimization, why haven't they taken legal actions during those 30-40 years and are coming out when he decided to run for president? Put it simply, they seek to destroy his chances and want monetary relief.

If the allegation has merit it will be validated by the evidence. If it does not, it will be debunked. Don’t assume a complainant’s prima facie case is sufficient proof of harassment. Too often people quickly and inappropriately rush to judgment, declaring harassment exists before the facts are known, the evidence is assessed, and a proper determination is made. It is frighteningly easy for a clever woman to provoke, distort & invent an entire harassment case against a man.

Pig, you must be those people who don't believe having evidence is sufficient enough to back up a claim. Relying too much on statements rather than fact-processing investigations. Go drown in corn oil and roast yourself.


Calling it a day, good night noobs.

There's not going to be evidence. They only came out after the video of Trump talking about sexually assaulting people came out, and many only came out after the first woman came out. You're ignorant to think that someone who actually was sexually assaulted would have taken legal action years ago and because they didn't, their credibility is lost. I don't ever automatically believe someone who accuses another of sexual assault, but many of his accusers have tried to stay out of the media, rather than seeking attention like you seem to think. There wouldn't have even been evidence back then. It would have been a he said, she said case. None of them have sued Trump yet, which is evidence to debunk your baseless accusation that they just wanted attention, money, and to ruin his campaign. You need to look at the evidence too, rather than just blindly supporting Trump.

Posted by Fulgore

That's just the biggest get out of jail free card ever. You're literally giving every excuse as to why the victim IS RIGHT 100%. Using the logic that they can just come out 10 years later when the time is coincidentally the most opportune and that they didn't do this earlier because "many victims don't come out" then how is it even possible that they're proved wrong? I could pull some **** and say my dad beat me 14 years ago but I didn't want to come out then, but now that he's running for office I activate my trap card. Nobody could come and prove it wrong, and society today swings to the "guilty until proven innocent" mentality due to the media. I've never seen "victims" so malicious in my life, much less the sheep that blindly follow them.

You couldn't have proven them wrong or right the day it happened. It was sexual assault, not rape. A he-said, she-said case. There's no physical evidence. They only came out specifically after he denied in the debate ever doing what he described in the then-recently released access hollywood tape.

What if your dad was caught on camera talking about how he can beat his son and get away with it? Then he would talk about how pushing him down the stairs would be an effective way to do that. He doesn't ever say he actually beat his son, but it's pretty blatantly obvious that he's suggesting it. Pretty sure almost everyone would believe the son whi came out years later.  

Still find it funny how people think Trump is equally as bad as Hillary.
Trump looks like a saint at this point compared to Hillary  

Posted by Bryan*

What's contained in these emails are disturbing and show all the lies and corruption connected to the Clinton's. Ignorant sheep 🐑.

Why do Trump Supporters like you for example have to stoop down insulting someone for a simple thing they say? I'm not ignorant. Yeah, I was born in the projects, surrounded by hundreds of bad influences to keep me down, but I decided to stay up. So before you insult me think of how your life is compared to mine because I've watched some of my friends and families die. I'm not going to insult you though.  

Posted by PigParty

There's not going to be evidence. They only came out after the video of Trump talking about sexually assaulting people came out, and many only came out after the first woman came out during the elections
(you forgot to add that). You're ignorant to think that someone who actually was sexually assaulted would have taken legal action years ago and because they didn't, their credibility is lost. I don't ever automatically believe someone who accuses another of sexual assault, but many of his accusers have tried to stay out of the media, rather than seeking attention like you seem to think. There wouldn't have even been evidence back then. It would have been a he said, she said case. None of them have sued Trump yet, which is evidence to debunk your baseless accusation that theyjust wanted attention, money, and to ruin his campaign. You need to look at the evidence too, rather than just blindly supporting Trump.

Spoiler

Few examples:
Women Accusing Trump (has been debunked)
• Jessica Leeds, accused Trump of groping her on the Braniff 727 stating, "young multimillionaire Trump lifted the armrest to grope me during the flight". False, the Braniff's armrest were stationary, cannot be raise. http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/14/news...leeds-armrest/

• Summer Zervos, a Clinton delegate (hmm not fishy at all), accused Trump of harassing her constantly. Turns out she was the one constantly messaging him via emails since April of this year. If Trump did sexually harass Zervos, why would she be reaching out for help with her business by contacting him?

• Mindy McGillivray, accused Trump of groping her at Mar-a-Lago on Jan. 24, 2003. There was no such concert at Mar-a-Lago on January 24, 2003. Critical details of McGillivray’s story don’t add up. Perhaps because they never bothered to verifying it ever occurred. An image search shows Trump and Melania posing with Ray Charles at Mar-A-Lago in a photo by Davidoff Photos Studio, created on January 1, 2003, more than three weeks before McGillivray claimed she was “groped" at a Ray Charles concert. A Ray Charles concert chronology shows that on January 23, a Ray Charles concert in Seattle was canceled, but nothing was scheduled for January 24.

Given all that I've read and heard about Donald Trump, it was obvious to me from the beginning that the stories were false and fabricated. If these women did not have any evidence that proves he sexually assaulted them, how does the allegation make it true? Tell me this WHAT woman is attacked on a plane and NO ONE sees it and she don't say anything? You're quick to judge without evidence Porky. As an added bonus Porky, In 2008, the Democrat media hit Republican John McCain with similar allegations. Vicki Iseman, the woman in the headlines, settled with The New York Times after the election. So, it is clear that this is a commonly used tactic by Democrats – use the media to slander and destroy their opponents during any election. Hillary would roast you, put you on a platter, then sweep it under the rug. You can say I blindly support Trump, but you blindly support a felon. Enough said. And you're supposedly a Criminal Justice major, pfft.

@John (you're getting emotional over being called a sheep):

So there is proof that Hillary has defamed the women her husband raped, she laughed about getting a child rapist off with time served, she has lied repeatedly about the emails, there is evidence that she does not have a concept of confidentiality but you choose to believe it's all make believe. Do research on her foreign policies that have FAILED. Lets not forget the racial ads your beloved candidate made for Obama. You have the right to vote, but grow some testicles to question the credibility on your candidate.  

Lol @ this whole thread and election
Both such **** shows  

https://youtu.be/_sbT3_9dJY4

"Now pay attention because it is far more subtle than american audiences would like. He is outlining actual treason. Funding and aiding an enemy of the state, by using the state department which arguably implicates Obama because it is his executive branch. South Korea is forcing President Park Geun-hye to flee for her life for similar accusations right now. This is hard evidence that the US destabilized Africa in order to get Clinton elected. It would be damaging if it stopped there but it also shows how Clinton armed ISIS which further exacerbated the refugee crisis. The Refugee Crisis would be bad on its own if not for the fact that aiding an enemy of the state is actually truthfully treason, not this "treason" that we have been throwing around for months about shady primary elections or prospecting financial investments in Cuba, but actual Benedict Arnold arming ISIS treason. If you are a liberal ask yourself how you feel about Iran/Contra and if you want to be the one defending it for the next 40 years because this mass migration taking place in Europe is the biggest thing to happen there since WW2. The memory of this wound will not fade quickly, and if soccer has taught me anything, its that Europe is good at holding a grudge.

This is bigger than if Trump had in fact shot someone on 5th avenue. This is why 200 french concert goers were murdered by ISIS using American weapons. This is evidence that the TRILLIONS of dollars being spent on refugees in all of Europe is a bill to set at the feet of America. This is why Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan was attacked. This is why the the UK left the EU. This is why hundreds of women in Scandinavia and Germany are being raped and assaulted. This is why Turkey may leave NATO. This is why Russia may This is why Trump wants to build a ****ing wall. Assange did not over-hype the ramifications of US involvement in Syria"