Veteran Players Opinion. Graal getting better or worse? - 4

GraalEtho · 09-25-2017

Posted by Sardon

can't say I like the new bounty system it requires more work
the nexus and other related updates are pretty cool tho however as always graal kinda seems boring after a while due to the fact that pk is equal which is why I moved to zodiac.

At this point in my life I am bored of the mobile servers especialy classic though it seems to be doing the most progress I don't view the game as interesting as I once did as I've been out of touch with many community members for years.

Classic has always and will probably always be the game that gets boring quick no matter how long you stay and how many guild house ideas you invent I would probably tell you the only 2 servers that were/are worth playing regularly was UN and currently is Zodiac.

UN being the best while it lived as it had a superb community filled with fun and annoying npcs aswell as the best events graal has witnessed.

Zodiac is great due to the way pk is diverse allowing you to spend hours making chars and owning/being owned on the battlefield.

Carry me on zodiac pls

Araragi · 09-28-2017

Off and on player that started 15 years ago in middle school by burning the installation file to a CD and playing an hour a day at a library with a trial account that reset every time you logged off.

The game has always been terrible. It was the community that kept people around. As someone noted before, the (playerworlds) are just virtual chatrooms in which each server offered a unique spin to draw in players. During my brief time playing iclassic, I found that the community resembled what I thought were glory days of PC Graal. As long as the game keeps up that community, the game will continue to "get better", or at least stay alive.

I have no idea why PC Graal as a platform died the way it did. I feel that Graal, with its ability to create your own virtual hangout spot, would have really taken off in the era of all these social sandbox mmos. I get that there was a focus shift to mobile and the IAP $$$, but damn it felt like PC Graal was choked out a little too quickly. If down the line the iclassic population gets too big, I wonder what "could have been" if PC Graal was still around with a couple of decently fleshed out classic playerworlds.

Sardon · 09-29-2017

Posted by GraalEtho

Carry me on zodiac pls

Forum pm me we can figure something out.

09-28-2017	47
Araragi Registered User Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 18	Off and on player that started 15 years ago in middle school by burning the installation file to a CD and playing an hour a day at a library with a trial account that reset every time you logged off. The game has always been terrible. It was the community that kept people around. As someone noted before, the (playerworlds) are just virtual chatrooms in which each server offered a unique spin to draw in players. During my brief time playing iclassic, I found that the community resembled what I thought were glory days of PC Graal. As long as the game keeps up that community, the game will continue to "get better", or at least stay alive. I have no idea why PC Graal as a platform died the way it did. I feel that Graal, with its ability to create your own virtual hangout spot, would have really taken off in the era of all these social sandbox mmos. I get that there was a focus shift to mobile and the IAP $$$, but damn it felt like PC Graal was choked out a little too quickly. If down the line the iclassic population gets too big, I wonder what "could have been" if PC Graal was still around with a couple of decently fleshed out classic playerworlds.