Posted by Elusive

The quote above me sums up the whole situation and in my opinion is 100% correct. No queries or doubts. It is the clearest way to put it to you.
Move on .

Omg did you even read what she said half the things she said had nothing to do with anything!11!111!11!111!!!111111111111  

Posted by Kendama

Omg did you even read what she said half the things she said had nothing to do with anything!11!111!11!111!!!111111111111

Agreed.  

I would also love to see timer go up to 100  

Posted by Manji

I would also love to see timer go up to 100

That would take the challenge out of it all...  

I would like to see prize winnings for every 1000's bracket group. We only have 2000 & 4000.  

Perhaps I was a bit carried away with my previous post, but I do bring valid points to the table. When someone posts a message too confusing to understand, it becomes increasingly difficult to answer accordingly.

It looks like nobody fully understood my post. While partly my fault, I think some of you are simply that kind of person to skim through a book to get to the ending. I discussed my thoughts on the proposed ideas for the archery game. If you don't think so, here is proof.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Kendama

1) Enlarged Buttons, our eyes get so focused on the targets its hard to keep track of where your finger is tapping, causing you to fail to shoot at critical times because u tap the wrong area.

Posted by Shannon

Larger buttons would obstruct my view, since I play on a computer. I feel like creating larger buttons only takes up server file cache space, and if you have played for a while with a single button size, it may be tough to adapt to a new size. When I tried it on my brother's iPod, it wasn't too difficult to press the buttons.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Kendama

2) Longer arrows. Many hats (including robin hood hat) get in the entire view of your arrow making it diffucult to determine how close your arrow is before you shoot it to the aiming lanes.

I actually read this part wrong, my mistake. Many people have asked for more hats for prizes, but apparently not in this post. Sorry for my own confusion.

And if it really bothers you, why not just take off your hat? Seems like a much easier solution to me.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Kendama

3) Skip target button. Skips the current target in play. Some games get 0 X targets and then others get like 5... It's a little OP. We should be able to click a button below or above the shoot button to skip a target.

I did not answer this part. If we have a time limit, we should not be able to skip X's to maximize your score. The number of X's is supposed to be random, and it has no purpose if everyone would skip them anyway.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Kendama

4) Points on-hit. When you miss a target, text appears where the missed target hit back wall and says "miss". Same with when you hit a target. It says "Hit" and bellow tells you your current points/how many points you gained from hit. Also includes Bulls-eye and X hits.

Did not answer this either. I think it is pretty obvious when you miss and hit. When you hit a target, it breaks. When you miss, it doesn't break. I feel like this issue you brought up is more of a personal preference than a future update. I personally would get really annoyed by the constant numbers popping up on my screen.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, to answer any complaints about fairness, and disperse any "suggestions" to make it more "fair" so it becomes easier for you:

Posted by Shannon

As for any further complaints about fairness or chance improvement, I have one reminder to be known... Technology is not always perfect. In fact, many times it can be found with many flaws. Being frustrated at a small mishap in the game like a little lag, false spar hit, small bug or glitch, or in this case an unregistered bulls-eye can be all because of simple flaw in technology. And there is nothing we can do about it. Compare it to receiving a failing grade on a paper in school. Suck it up, and move on. There really is no other way to put it behind you successfully. You cannot change the result, or the factors leading up to the result.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Maikeru

Overall, nothing needs to change.. Just wait for the minor tweaks for the archery..

Sorry, but archery is finalized and will not be updated any further.

Killing me, making me write this long a post.. x.X  

Shannon why do you think you know all this? First off his post wasnt hard to read at all as YOU were the ONLY one who couldnt read it. Second off these obviously are suggestions for an update, not complaints. If an update would take place i would want longer arrows and biiger keys myself (target skip isnt necessary). I always forget my hat and i end up having difficuilty that round. It would just make it easier for a quick fix to this (mabye it auto-takes your hat off).


I dont know what makes you the knowledge god and know whats going to happen with everything, every post you make is

"Not going to happen its perfect how it is. Move on"  

Posted by Goblin

Shannon why do you think you know all this? First off his post wasnt hard to read at all as YOU were the ONLY one who couldnt read it. Second off these obviously are suggestions for an update, not complaints. If an update would take place i would want longer arrows and biiger keys myself (target skip isnt necessary). I always forget my hat and i end up having difficuilty that round. It would just make it easier for a quick fix to this (mabye it auto-takes your hat off).


I dont know what makes you the knowledge god and know whats going to happen with everything, every post you make is

"Not going to happen its perfect how it is. Move on"

I could hardly read your post through the flame and lack of punctuation! I could be an ass and come up with a smart comeback, but I could also simply state that I already answered the complaint you have on my post. I also answered with my thoughts on the ideas you restated in your most recent post. There is no need for clarification. Also, I have already stated my clear differentiation between complaint and proposed suggestion. If you do not understand this, you probably shouldn't start a flame war!

Knowledge god? Let's come back to Earth now... I discussed my thoughts on the topic like a forum is meant for. If you want to complain about my thoughts on the topic because you hate me so personally, you can shoot me a PM to work things out. In the meantime, let's grow up and get back on topic, shall we? ;)  

Posted by Shannon

I could hardly read your post through the flame and lack of punctuation! I could be an ass and come up with a smart comeback, but I could also simply state that I already answered the complaint you have on my post. I also answered with my thoughts on the ideas you restated in your most recent post. There is no need for clarification. Also, I have already stated my clear differentiation between complaint and proposed suggestion. If you do not understand this, you probably shouldn't start a flame war!

Knowledge god? Let's come back to Earth now... I discussed my thoughts on the topic like a forum is meant for. If you want to complain about my thoughts on the topic because you hate me so personally, you can shoot me a PM to work things out. In the meantime, let's grow up and get back on topic, shall we? ;)

You are extreemly irritating. And my punctutation is fine. Sorry im not a graammar nerd, obviously grammar is your passion.
Differentiation
Clarification
Proposed
GTFO its a game not ****ing school  

ITT people use the term "OP" when they don't know what it means.  

Posted by Dusty

ITT people use the term "OP" when they don't know what it means.

Original post is it not?  

@ shannon, dont neg rep me because i was pointing our you were talking about somthing irrevelant. Please stop acting like your a super-admin-mom and just chill. Your grammar is a little iritating and you are trying a little too hard to act "mature" it makes you "immature".

@ Duty, My bad, OP= Over powered. I noticed it dident really fit in after i submitted post.  

Posted by Goblin

You are extreemly irritating. And my punctutation is fine. Sorry im not a graammar nerd, obviously grammar is your passion.
Differentiation
Clarification
Proposed
GTFO its a game not ****ing school

Get back on topic, please. Stop hating on other people because you may not like them for disagreeing with you. I type like a mature person, leave it at that. You missed at least five to six periods and commas in your post, I was just pointing it out for future correction.  

Posted by Notorious#

Original post is it not?

Not in this instance, where it's being used as "Over Powered."

Posted by Kendama

Some games get 0 X targets and then others get like 5... It's a little OP.

It's just something that irks me a little; when people fling around gameplay terms like that when it doesn't even fit. It is not in any way "over powered" for targets to have a chance of showing up more for one player than another. Probability isn't under powered or over powered.



Anyways, I'll post more appropriately on the subject.

Posted by Kendama

1) Enlarged Buttons, our eyes get so focused on the targets its hard to keep track of where your finger is tapping, causing you to fail to shoot at critical times because u tap the wrong area.

While you may think this will fix anything, it won't. The idea of larger buttons may seem like a good idea at first but in reality it's the opposite. While you've been playing Graal your mind has been hardwiring itself to interact with the game on a subconscious level. You don't need to look down to know where to tap, albeit at much less responsive level than that of a physical controller. Changing the button sizes(or even remapping them like in the mockup) will only **** with your head and cause you to relapse on some instances where your mind will see Graal, and try to instinctively hit where it thinks the buttons would be. I'd much rather see Graal add options to let you change control sizes globally, rather than for this one minigame to muck around with them.

Posted by Kendama

2) Longer arrows. Many hats (including robin hood hat) get in the entire view of your arrow making it diffucult to determine how close your arrow is before you shoot it to the aiming lanes.

I always noticed the high scores were made by people with the floating eye head. Coincidence!?

Posted by Kendama

3) Skip target button. Skips the current target in play. Some games get 0 X targets and then others get like 5... It's a little OP. We should be able to click a button below or above the shoot button to skip a target.

I see this button getting in the way more than anything. You already said you hit the wrong buttons all the time, can you imagine what would happen with this button, skipping over a legit O target and messing up a streak? Just leave it the way it is, there is a luck factor involved in the game and people are just going to have to accept that.

Posted by Kendama

4) Points on-hit. When you miss a target, text appears where the missed target hit back wall and says "miss". Same with when you hit a target. It says "Hit" and bellow tells you your current points/how many points you gained from hit. Also includes Bulls-eye and X hits.

Last I talked to Rufus, this sort of thing was going to be added(before the game was finished), but it looks like it never was. I can only assume there was a reason for leaving it out.  

Posted by Dusty

Not in this instance, where it's being used as "Over Powered."



It's just something that irks me a little; when people fling around gameplay terms like that when it doesn't even fit. It is not in any way "over powered" for targets to have a chance of showing up more for one player than another. Probability isn't under powered or over powered.



Anyways, I'll post more appropriately on the subject.


While you may think this will fix anything, it won't. The idea of larger buttons may seem like a good idea at first but in reality it's the opposite. While you've been playing Graal your mind has been hardwiring itself to interact with the game on a subconscious level. You don't need to look down to know where to tap, albeit at much less responsive level than that of a physical controller. Changing the button sizes(or even remapping them like in the mockup) will only **** with your head and cause you to relapse on some instances where your mind will see Graal, and try to instinctively hit where it thinks the buttons would be. I'd much rather see Graal add options to let you change control sizes globally, rather than for this one minigame to muck around with them.


I always noticed the high scores were made by people with the floating eye head. Coincidence!?


I see this button getting in the way more than anything. You already said you hit the wrong buttons all the time, can you imagine what would happen with this button, skipping over a legit O target and messing up a streak? Just leave it the way it is, there is a luck factor involved in the game and people are just going to have to accept that.


Last I talked to Rufus, this sort of thing was going to be added(before the game was finished), but it looks like it never was. I can only assume there was a reason for leaving it out.

I agree with alot of what you said. If we can change buttons globally based on optimization that would be great and better than just the mini-game change. But with the skip-button option, its the con V pro. If you use it, you can skip X's. However you also may accidently skip a O target. Its based on skill (adding a little more skill than luck to the game)

And again, lol. IK what you mean about OP idk why i put it in there. And what do you mean highscores with floating eye head? lol im not on highscored for arcehryl. My top is like 4860