I think this would be nice to have. But like Winter said, It shouldn't be necessary. (I think that's what she meant). I personally think that if a hacker or lagger joins your guild and mucks up your "reputation", then you deserve it for abusing the guild system. Really you should just be recruiting friends and people you trust. Unfortunately that won't be "efficient" or fast enough when you are trying to build a major towering guild (Which seems to be the big reason people even make guilds)...

I really cannot see this being added anyway. I guess I am saying don't recruit someone unless you are sure you will keep them.  

Posted by Mr.$imons

I really cannot see this being added anyway. I guess I am saying don't recruit someone unless you are sure you will keep them.

The problem is, you can never be 100% sure. I'm sure this has happened to everyone by now. That one drama causer in the guild (I can go on for hours listing the ones we had to kick in mine) who doesn't want to stay, but doesn't want to leave. You may have thought they were cool at first, but soon enough they start showing their true colors then there's conflict, drama, and rumors going around which leads to a big mess. Then they start to get creative, join again as a "new person" then end up causing trouble again. Or another case may be, say a tower guild for example: as the leader, you don't want someone in. But that someone is your good friend's friend. Your good friend is a co leader, perm, or whatever it's called nowadays in your guild and whenever you're AFK or logged off he keeps recruiting that person, and you don't want to keep kicking them. You could take away your friend's rights or kick him, but on the other hand he/she is a good leader in this case and you don't want to do that. Perhaps it shouldn't be so much as a "guild ban" but more so of a blacklist system. It would really help a lot of guilds, including mine since I recruit based off of supports from my members. More than 90% of the time, I have no idea who the person is so I'm just taking their word on it. Beyond that, I cannot predict how that person may behave or act. But that falls back to what Simons said about not recruiting someone unless you're 100% sure you want to keep them. You don't know these things, no one does until they're plopped into the guild. Even my guild, highly selective enough as it is, runs into these problems. They probably won't be completely solved with a system like this, yes, but it does offer a good amount of help when determining recruits.  

Posted by Blueh

Average Blueh Post

Yes you can be sure, my friend iMoo has lead the guild GS for about a year now and we have still not had any problems. We aren't dead or empty either, fully functioning and active. But my point is he is doing something right. I think the key is just not to give any powers but News and Rank, unless you have some strict system about the 2, but usually someone can't mess up a guild with only those two powers.  

Posted by Imprint

Shared guild houses.

YES. Ive always wanted guild houses to be attached to the actual guild intead of the individual player. Like once you buy a guild, you have the ability to buy a guild house from in-app shop (guild owners has to pay the $5 for his guild's guild house.) and the guild house is available to anyone in your guild anytime. When you hit Menu > Guild House > enter guild house, you enter the guild house that belongs to the guild tag you currently have set. Any guild members can invite players to the guild house (or for security, make this optional?)  

I have already talked to some iClassic Developers and they said there might come a new Guild System soon and this might be added to it.
Also, Winter, if you are against this system, you and your guild could just ignore it. Act like there is no System and the probleme is solved. But there are other Guilds for which this System would be really usefull.  

Posted by Mr.$imons

Yes you can be sure, my friend iMoo has lead the guild GS for about a year now and we have still not had any problems. We aren't dead or empty either, fully functioning and active. But my point is he is doing something right. I think the key is just not to give any powers but News and Rank, unless you have some strict system about the 2, but usually someone can't mess up a guild with only those two powers.

We don't give people powers, except in Helsing temporarily, but I watch over that personally, so there's no outside recruiting or kicking power abuse. The issue is the actual person in the guild. He/she doesn't need guild powers to start an aggressive verbal exchange or to hack/glitch.  

Is not like low ranks (like me) in Zanza are gonna get powers haha  

Nice Idea.....But how the hell is it gonna work and i think the gani is gonna be hard to make as i see it  

Great Idea  

Posted by Robert.

Also, Winter, if you are against this system, you and your guild could just ignore it. Act like there is no System and the probleme is solved. But there are other Guilds for which this System would be really usefull.

Thanks, but I didn't say I was against it.. In fact, I specifically said that I am not against it earlier on in this thread. I just don't believe it would work as well as you'd think it would. I would support it, though.  

Posted by Asaiki

Nice Idea.....But how the hell is it gonna work and i think the gani is gonna be hard to make as i see it

For this iClassic has some really good Developers ;)  

Hey! I posted about this before I think! It is a good idea isn't it?  

Posted by TheTraveler

Hey! I posted about this before I think! It is a good idea isn't it?

Most people say so, so I guess yes.