![]() |
|
09-19-2015
|
31 |
|
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
towering will always be a social cuddlefest until you can no longer recruit and kick members with no consequence
|
|
09-19-2015
|
32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,027
|
that has been stated numerous times, and being limited to one ally would be great (actual allied seperate guild, not a sub spot) Loyal guilds, towering with friends, more guilds to fight over each tower. |
|
09-19-2015
|
33 |
|
Graal Classic
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Battle Arena
Posts: 855
|
|
|
09-19-2015
|
34 | |
|
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
Towering was (probably, since I wasn't around for it) competitive when it first became a thing because it's fresh, new, everyone wants those early records, everyone wants to be the best the fastest, etc. Time passed and people adjusted and now there's some sort of a meta and every new towering guild follows that same model, which is to make a guild, ally just about everyone possible, recruit just about everyone possible, and make an effort to achieve 1k hours in the most painless way possible That will never change until it's forced, but honestly I'm not even sure if it needs to be changed... Apparently a lot of people seem to enjoy it, since there are always people towering We complain on these forums about it, but maybe towering is best as some stale two-month social experience that guilds are currently getting out of it I enjoyed my time in at least 4 of the 5 tower guilds I ran, but I can honestly say it wasn't a very competitive or engaging gameplay experience |
|
|
09-19-2015
|
35 |
|
: - )
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,427
|
...i actually like having a tower ![]() i like running around and getting angry at PKers memories, man |
|
09-19-2015
|
36 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 264
|
|