Honestly having "judges" makes anything subjective. Unless they are monitors, looking to make the game go smoothly and cleanly.

So yeah, I would stay away in having judges unless you want participants complaining how they favored one or the other.  

Posted by slyde

Honestly having "judges" makes anything subjective. Unless they are monitors, looking to make the game go smoothly and cleanly.

So yeah, I would stay away in having judges unless you want participants complaining how they favored one or the other.

Having people involved owuld make anything subjective, but saying that they'll monitor the events instead of judge them sounds neater. I would probably give those chosen to monitor the events have a different approach to their assignment as well.  

Fashion show and Role Play 1v1s please!!!!  

Posted by Fulgore

If you want a more competitive event like you were saying earlier, a fashion show is not the way to go. Things like the turf war, ctf, or something similar is a competitive game. Being judged on a fashion show is basically arbitrary and subjective. The others have objective goals that players or teams are competing to reach either the fastest or the best.

The fashion show was merely a suggestion made and brought up to see how it would be taken. Regardless of whether it will happen or not the event remains competitive with turf wars and the other mini games.

Posted by slyde

Honestly having "judges" makes anything subjective. Unless they are monitors, looking to make the game go smoothly and cleanly.

So yeah, I would stay away in having judges unless you want participants complaining how they favored one or the other.

As of right now the judges are monitors and one or two are helping me plan this event.  

Posted by CM

I don't think that's what OP is planning to do

Idk about you but wasting 10 hours for nothing seems fun.