![]() |
|
|
| Poll Results: Thread Title | |||
| 6.56% |
#1
|
||
| 18.03% |
#2
|
||
| 6.56% |
#3
|
||
| 42.62% |
#4
|
||
| 26.23% |
None of the above, Aguzo doesn't know anything.
|
||
| Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Topic Tools |
|
06-18-2015
|
121 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,379
|
|
|
|
06-18-2015
|
122 | |
|
Python
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,894
|
Either way, opinions of everyone should be treated the same. Just because there might be some Alumni representation on the thread against the idea doesn't mean we're willfully trying to stop it. We're just stating reasons why we dislike it. |
|
|
06-18-2015
|
123 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,379
|
|
|
|
06-18-2015
|
124 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,027
|
![]() All I'm saying is that I see half the votes for option 5 from alumni/friends of members. Just pointing it out, it's kind of like the whole "vote what your buddy voted" sort of thing. I have asked some of the voters for the other options, and most agreed that #4 is great, but probably lacking amount of sparrers, and dedication from devs. Lacking sparrers: Player-matches fixed that, plus I think there are enough sparrers for lots of daily ranked matches. Adding prizes fixes amount in ranked matches either way. Don't want to spar? Then I'll take the prizes by myself, I'm sure someone else will happily take your spot on ladder. Dedication from devs: Up to them, I saw rufus on earlier adding some cool stuff like the queue countdown, and I think gs streak count? Either way, the staff seem interested in helping out. That's all that matters. Doesn't have to be my idea. If anyone has better ideas, then by all means post it.
I want to keep posting to at least add one of the things mentioned and answer questions, because I am bored of sparring, and only want to fight good people + instantly, and have a real ranking system.This ranking system could even qualify as a means to finally have a UTC in iclassic. Think about how much fun that could be. |
||
|
06-18-2015
|
125 | |||||
|
Hyrule Knights
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In your head 24/7
Posts: 6,348
|
the #100 ranked legendary player by .5? If so, how does that reflect skills with the points you receive?Note/FYI: Miraculously a spar related thread managed to stay on-topic without any flamewars, so if you want it to stay like that I suggest you drop the smartassm attitude by trying to make it look as if people on this thread are stupid. Well MBK is, but he's just a cheerleader ![]() ![]()
|
|||||
|
06-18-2015
|
126 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: enter my house!
Posts: 141
|
hey guys this is my first post and I hope this can be somewhat relevant to this thread I think spar leaderboards should be taken out completely, and instead: I think that in order to make sparring more meaningful we need to have single spar tournaments like GST. It shows who are the best based on how well they do and it creates more popularity and relevance to spar. and you don't have to basically no life the game in order to succeed, for example many skilled inactive sparrers who come back right at GST are still able to perform at a high quality. This probably won't solve the consistency of sparring, but it will definitely lure in more players around the times they happen. This isn't really a spar system but our end goal is to help the sparring community so I wanted to share this |
|
06-18-2015
|
127 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,027
|
Taking it out would also give no purpose to spar. Pretty much just wasting time raising your wins, and the only thing that would matter is ratio (which can be fake by selective sparring). |
|||
|
06-18-2015
|
128 |
|
Studying for graalians
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 304
|
|
|
06-18-2015
|
129 |
|
Bloodvayne
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,087
|
|
|
06-18-2015
|
130 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: enter my house!
Posts: 141
|
A tourney + system#4 is a graal players dream, but this sounds like a nightmare for staff to manage |
|
|
06-18-2015
|
131 | |
|
Studying for graalians
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 304
|
Brett would defeat Comyt 10-0 or 9-1 consistently in series. On another note, an invite only sparring league would be fun. |
|
|
06-18-2015
|
132 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,379
|
|
|
|
06-18-2015
|
133 | |
|
Hyrule Knights
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In your head 24/7
Posts: 6,348
|
I will add another scenario: Brett is #1 legendary and Kuz, MBK, Fulgore, Ash, and Sardon are #96, 97, 98, 99, 100 in the legendary rankings. GOAT and Pacman are the tier below with the same points and tied in their ranking. I happen to beat Brett 5 in a row by .5. Pacman beats the other 5 in order by .5. Does it make sense that I would get the same amount of points that pacman got? Skill would definitely not be measured accurately. Hint: with the lower tiers it doesn't matter because the skill level between the #1 ranking and last # ranking from each tier won't be a big difference. The upper tier is different because it doesn't have a max, so the difference in skill within 2 legendary sparers can be comical. lol nice, very sneaky how you through that insult there. No worries, you didn't.
Last edited by GOAT; 06-18-2015 at 05:22 AM.
Reason: threw*
|
|
|
06-18-2015
|
134 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,027
|
[QUOTE=rickclops;581104]All the people in legendary tier are very good, but not in the same league as each other.[QUOTE] Yes, but the less tiers the more matches. Would be great, if people wouldn't abuse/spar their friends for points. If that were implemented, it could be fixed by just adding a time-out restriction after you sparred that same person for 2-3 matches during a set period of time. Clops fights Sean 2 times. Server: "You are not allowed to request a match with this person for at least 23:59:01"
|
||
|
06-18-2015
|
135 | |
|
Studying for graalians
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 304
|
|
|