the graphics in classic has improved greatly yet the trees look god awful, i actually expected the trees to be remade ages ago but it never happened..


the old maloria trees are also pretty old but it looks alot more realistic.


this old tree looks unfinished but it still looks better.


another trees that actually have leaves, disregard the pine tree on the right since it's a ripoff of zelda


the trees on classic bugs me alot, i don't mind the tree trunks but the tree tops really needs to go

just imagine how nicely shaded the new trees would be, Please save the Trees!  

#PrayForHarambeAndSaveGraalTrees  

While you're at it, change the bushes. And the Houses. And those ugly rocks.  

no, cuz classic  

If you haven't noticed , graal classic has been aiming is self at a more cartoony look for a while now and the trees kinda play the role , although I do agree that they aren't the best looking and someone in the community could probably make a much better attempt at them in a cartoon theme. However I don't think any of the ones you have posted play the role  

I agree, hate those ugly trees >.<'  

Mario mountains don't look realistic, what a horrible looking game!

http://www.themushroomkingdom.net/images/remakes/smas/smas-smb3_w1-1.png (Unsupported image host)  

Posted by Dusty

Mario mountains don't look realistic, what a horrible looking game!

http://www.themushroomkingdom.net/images/remakes/smas/smas-smb3_w1-1.png (Unsupported image host)

What mountains?  

Posted by Ivy

What mountains?

The round things. Hills, mountains, I dunno. But they're also in the distance so it's one or the other I think. Either way not everything needs to be a literal and/or realistic interpretation. After all, Graal is styled after Zelda which has trees similar to Graal.


Also, doing nice-looking trees that look cartoony and "realistic" at the same time in Graal's format is difficult.  

Posted by Dusty

The round things. Hills, mountains, I dunno. But they're also in the distance so it's one or the other I think. Either way not everything needs to be a literal and/or realistic interpretation. After all, Graal is styled after Zelda which has trees similar to Graal.


Also, doing nice-looking trees that look cartoony and "realistic" at the same time in Graal's format is difficult.

I always though those where mean to be trees for some reason ...

My idea of classic trees would be wide leaves that only use 4-8 colours to keep the simple cartoony look , but of course that just purely my opinion and as I'm not really the best at art my opinion isn't very significant.  

Don't fix **** if it ain't broken.  

http://bluecrescent.rpgcafe.net/zelda/examples/tree-comparison.gif (Unsupported image host)


I googled these  

The thing is if I never played classic before , and I came across a picture of the tree picture that cecily posted I'd never guess those are tree tops. They kinda look like those weird ballon shaped animals clowns make  

Posted by Saber Alumba

The thing is if I never played classic before , and I came across a picture of the tree picture that cecily posted I'd never guess those are tree tops. They kinda look like those weird ballon shaped animals clowns make

thats cuz the bottom half of the tree is cut off  

always thought they looked like watermelons