|
What about babies born with severe deformities?
And I ain't talking about a club foot or something, I'm talking SEVERELY deformed.
Some babies are literally born into a life of pain, their existence is hurting them because of some underdeveloped vital organ or something.
If nothing could've been done to save it, wouldn't it have been better to just have aborted it or maybe even euthanized it after it was born?
Does that agree with your moral compass?
Not everything is black and white. Life has complications. How we deal with those complications is up to us and not anyone else.
I also believe the human race is in grave danger of overpopulation. I'd rather not have my children or their children have to fight over precious resources that may be scarce in the future because a bunch of dumb teenagers went ahead and got pregnant and weren't allowed to abort.
If somebody is not fit to bear children then they shouldn't.
|
I believe in... what's that called? Quality of Life law or something. It's the one where you can essentially kill yourself because you're sick/in pain, etc. I never said anything's black and white. In fact, I've said multiple times how complex every situation is. Hell, that's why some bills have 70,000 pages (although that's mostly for political gain). I believe both parents (not just the mother) are obligated to look out for the best interest of their child. Yes, that includes euthanizing or abortion in some cases. I don't believe mental illness is a reason for abortion in most cases, but physical abnormalities could, in some cases, be a valid reason to abort a baby, or euthanize one that's already born. I don't think a mother is looking out for her baby if she aborts it because she doesn't want to deal with raising a child.