Idk if anyone brought this up, but i was thinking about this over time but why dont we have an Option for "The right to give rights" what i mean is you give that person a right to give other rights and obviously it's someone you trust. Like i think it should be an option cause your not on all the time and such you know.... I dont have much to back the idea up-- Ok lets say GETS for instance, Because i was with them for a while, ok lets say Donnie Gets Banned for like 1-2 months but he cant give anyone rights, but if we had that option Rush could give others rights. Do ya feel me?  

cool idea  

Thanks  

Obviously this will just be a another way to troll sK and ebizou just kick all  

I said give it to people you trust  

You mean a player other than the leader of the gang able to give powers?  

But what if the leader gave someone the right to give rights but them he took everyone's rights away and then usurped the throne. *gets idea* Ohhh heartssyyyyyyyyy  

Well, I'm sure the founder would be immune. Anyway, this could be mixed into the thread about multiple leaders. You have a short list of a few people who are unkickable, and in turn they're powers would be unchangeable. Given, that the persons who become these "real sub leaders" receive full powers. Anyway, I like the idea.  

Seems good but yeah somepeople who you think you trust turn out to betray you. But maybe have different options for being able to add powers and take away power?  

Posted by Infernus Lapse

But what if the leader gave someone the right to give rights but them he took everyone's rights away and then usurped the throne. *gets idea* Ohhh heartssyyyyyyyyy

Dude you cant give them the right to give rights that give rights, Meaning they can only give "Kick,recruit, news and ranks"

Also i didnt know it was another thread :O
But hey it's still a good idea in my book  

Posted by Bulldogg Lucero

give them the right to give rights that give rights

wat  

I said you give them the right to give rights(Recruit,Rank,Kick,GangNews)  

wouldn't work, because the leader gives a player rights. the player gives another person rights, but the person betrays the player..

/\ makes sense once you read 3 times.  

But it'll be the leaders fault for trusting the person who they gave the rights to give rights  

but the other person might trust the person they give rights too