![]() |
|
07-06-2015
|
1 |
|
cute frog
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,644
|
Archery
We've had Archery for a few years now, and as it is now, it's almost a perfect system. Almost. When Archery was released the main goal was to reach 2,000 and 4,000 points in order to receive the 200 Arrows queue and the archery hat. Once you get those two things, there really is nothing more archery can offer for you. You can argue that you can try to beat the high score, but here's the thing: The highest score you can reach in archery is 9,800 (and I believe you have to do this by lagging your device and getting all bullseyes). When the high score is beat (which is 9,800), a message is broadcast congratulating the person who received this score. Cool, huh? Well, for that instance it is. But the thing is, whoever is first to reach this score will always be ranked #1 on the scoreboard. The high score can no longer be beat, even if you tie with it. There's no way to get your own name on that leaderboard (the only way is to be the first to get 9,800 points when the scoreboard resets). This is pretty much what kills archery. Once you get the two prizes, there's nothing more for you. You can't even beat the high score, so trying to get to the top is hopeless. Here is what I am proposing to make archery more competitve and alive:
Hopefully a lot of you support this idea. I think it would definitely make archery much more competitive and active. A new leaderboard could also be implemented which listed the top ten players. If this were implemented, I would find myself in the archery range much more often. Thanks for reading everyone. |
|
07-06-2015
|
2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Battle Arena
Posts: 1,550
|
Sounds great, you have my support.
|
|
07-06-2015
|
3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,027
|
That would be too ez, archery is too easy. Basically whoever lasts the longest? I think I could be there for hours, unless lag spikes tag along.
|
|
07-06-2015
|
4 | |
|
cute frog
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,644
|
|
|
|
07-07-2015
|
5 |
|
Elder ✔️
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,286
|
doosty pls ):
|
|
07-07-2015
|
6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 174
|
I would love this!
|
|
07-07-2015
|
7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 21
|
u guys should just release guns lol
|
|
07-07-2015
|
8 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 1,000
|
as the person who is currently sitting on the sign with 9,800 points, i would greatly appreciate this as i would be able to further my score and shoot for hundreds of thousands of points and further assert my dominance in the archery world.
|
|
07-07-2015
|
9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,027
|
9,800 is as far as you can go. A lot of people have gotten it. Maybe if the lines below were taken off, it would be harder to aim. |
|
07-07-2015
|
10 | |
|
cute frog
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,644
|
If this were implemented it would mean you would see different people with a high score and it wouldn't just be the first person who managed to reach 9,800 points before anyone else. |
|
|
07-07-2015
|
11 | |
|
Enguard & Alumni
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,773
|
If they just fixed that and made it so that the high score announces every time 9800 is tied, I don't even think it'd be so bad under the current system |
|
|
07-07-2015
|
12 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 1,000
|
no idea what you guys are talking about with "lagging your devices" you obviously haven't even gotten 9800. lag just makes the next target pop up and go back down really fast and ruins your streak. sadly for you who want to believe that there is cheating in archery, there is none as far as i know and it's all just queueing up repeatedly until you finally get lucky and get no X's to appear. i find it extremely easy to hit every single bullseye and i'm sure everyone else who competes for 9800 feels the same way. archery is easy.
|
|
07-07-2015
|
13 | |
|
Earning Unix dem stacks
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: In a fox hole somewhere
Posts: 7,391
|
and I agree OP 100% |
|