Posted by CM

Again, it goes back to the question of "Are the qualified? Do they have account history? What is there "image" like in the community? Do they have a forum presence?" You can't hire someone just because they would "make good GPs in theory".

While there are times where GPs can patrol areas, usually there's always a bunch of reports coming in that there isn't much time, so usually they won't visit the spar arena unless there is a report there.

If what you're telling me is true, that there's no way you can do better with the hiring process, then why are there still problems? And why are other organizations, companies, etc capable of screening volunteers and hiring employees who don't cause these problems?

This is ultimately the question you should be asking instead of insisting that your method is infallible. In the end, you and your team are the front facing community presence of Toonslab, even though you're only volunteers, because god forbid Xor, MD or unixmad make a public statement about something. You have to live up to that professionally and if there's way to improve then you should be trying to find them.

Posted by CM

Once again, GPs don't have any sort of involvement with the game engine or how it can be fixed. Since there is no point in talking about that I'll stop talking about this topic since the only people who have any sort of control over that are the developers themselves.

I'm still not talking about code - again, it was a parallel example. Dusty and fp4 have worked magic with the code despite engine restrictions.

If you put your mind to it I'm sure you could work magic with the current tools available for dealing with problem players, specifically hackers in this case. You just need better approaches to finding and getting rid of them in a timely manner. You can't rely on code as you and I have both stated, therefore to do that, you have to rely on and hone your team's habits, response times and approaches to dealing with hackers or hire more effective volunteers.

Posted by CM

No system is perfect. They will all have flaws. If you have a suggestion for how the system can be improved I'm sure the GPs would like to hear it.

We've been giving you suggestions for three pages now and you're just telling us how they're wrong, despite many of us having more experience and giving you perfectly reasonable and effective suggestions.

Posted by CM

As ridiculous as it sounds, it's true. Yes maybe a few here and there will stop, but a majority of these hackers know what they are doing, and thus know how to get around these bans. It's impossible to stop them all.

It's impossible to stop them all, but as I stated earlier, most of them are randoms with no knowledge just trying out [software] because they heard you can run through walls or something with it. You're vastly overestimating the number of dedicated, knowledgeable cheaters there are on this game. As a side note, it goes to show what a problem you have when players have more knowledge of the habits of hackers than the staff team tasked with preventing them from running rampant.

Elder Scrolls Online (and many other games) had this problem early on as well - bots teleporting all over the world insta-mining minerals and other trade items. Zenimax managed to argue that there wasn't a problem for a while but it took them no time to clean up the hackers once they acknowledged there was a problem and they could in fact do something about it. edit: Yes, they have full access to their game and engine, but the first step of their solution was to acknowledge that there's a problem. Once you acknowledge there's a problem you can solve somehow, then you can start solving it.

For future reference also, using [software] and then changing your IP after you get banned doesn't show that you have knowledge.

Posted by CM

A prime example of how far BSing an application will get you. Yes he got hired, but look where he is now. :x

So you acknowledge the problem. But for every success story (is he even a success story? I can't tell from the context) you have about hiring some immature kid who effectively bluffed their application and went on to do well, you have three more people who have caused enough problems that a large portion of the community feels a bigger discussion about the way admins are hired is warranted.  

Posted by CM

As for "corrupt admins", I can't really think of anyone who has abused their powers in the past couple of years (except Soren but that was almost three years ago I think).

Lol thanks Raina for all those free event hats. This was 12 months ago  

When i used to play i loved if someone would cuss at you in pms admin would say "there is a reason the block option exists" but when it came to them they would ban for harassing an admin.

I remember being banned in 2012 for asking an admin for the hat of a long gone player (had absolutely no knowledge on the game) and was banned because i asked multiple times without a response and was banned. lmao  

Posted by David

CM... it is ridiculous as it sounds, though. What is your answer to stop them? Stop banning them? Let them spar in the streak room to 4,000 spars because "banning them won't stop them from just doing it again anyways"? What are you saying exactly? That banning hackers isn't an effective way to deal with them? Then what is? Shutting down iClassic?

I never said that. I just said that they keep coming back and the only thing we can do is keep banning them and hope they eventually stop. I didn't say anything about not banning them anymore.

The problem isn't that they're being banned enough. The problem is they keep coming back. Even if there are people dedicated to these areas, people will keep coming back.

Posted by Relic

If what you're telling me is true, that there's no way you can do better with the hiring process, then why are there still problems? And why are other organizations, companies, etc capable of screening volunteers and hiring employees who don't cause these problems?

Once again, never said that. All systems have flaws. If you have suggestions for how to improve the system, they are appreciated.

Posted by Relic

This is ultimately the question you should be asking instead of insisting that your method is infallible. In the end, you and your team are the front facing community presence of Toonslab, even though you're only volunteers, because god forbid Xor, MD or unixmad make a public statement about something. You have to live up to that professionally and if there's way to improve then you should be trying to find them.


I'm still not talking about code - again, it was a parallel example. Dusty and fp4 have worked magic with the code despite engine restrictions.

One final word on this topic. GPs have no involvement with that whatsoever. Even if a GP wanted to get involved with that, they probably wouldn't be able to.

If you put your mind to it I'm sure you could work magic with the current tools available for dealing with problem players, specifically hackers in this case. You just need better approaches to finding and getting rid of them in a timely manner. You can't rely on code as you and I have both stated, therefore to do that, you have to rely on and hone your team's habits, response times and approaches to dealing with hackers or hire more effective volunteers.

I'm sure everyone on the staff team would love for all of the hackers to disappear, but unfortunately it doesn't work like that. The best they can do, as you said, is coordinate times, but there are just simply those times when nobody is online to do anything, and sometimes that isn't preventable.

We've been giving you suggestions for three pages now and you're just telling us how they're wrong, despite many of us having more experience and giving you perfectly reasonable and effective suggestions.

For the application process? I haven't seen anything other than "hire people with more gameplay". Like, okay, I'm sure the higher ups would love to hire more players experienced in those aspects of gameplay, but things like ban/account history cannot just simply be overlooked, and that is the way the application process will always be, no matter what shape or form it takes.

Personally, I think there should be a portion of the application that gives situations that the player must respond to. Someone suggested this here and I've been an advocate for the idea because I feel as if it would give an idea of how the player would do in certain situations. Things like "You see your best friend who is an admin adding hats and multiple other items to their player account while nobody else is online", just as an example.

So you acknowledge the problem. But for every success story (is he even a success story? I can't tell from the context) you have about hiring some immature kid who effectively bluffed their application and went on to do well, you have three more people who have caused enough problems that a large portion of the community feels a bigger discussion about the way admins are hired is warranted.

Yes, the problem exists. Based off of his post I would assume he was terminated from his position, but I don't even know who he isn't so I wouldn't know.  

Posted by CM

I never said that. I just said that they keep coming back and the only thing we can do is keep banning them and hope they eventually stop. I didn't say anything about not banning them anymore.

The problem isn't that they're being banned enough. The problem is they keep coming back. Even if there are people dedicated to these areas, people will keep coming back.

When someone is able to streak 56 spars straight (breaking the streak record) on godmode in the streak room while 2 GPs are online then yes, it becomes a problem of these people not being banned quickly enough and/or frequently enough. This happened like two weeks ago. Not to mention the person did it two days in a row....

You're fighting a losing battle if you're trying to convince active players that continually banning hackers is ineffective. It's just incorrect in every single way conceivable.  

Posted by David

When someone is able to streak 56 spars straight (breaking the streak record) on godmode in the streak room while 2 GPs are online then yes, it becomes a problem of these people not being banned quickly enough and/or frequently enough. This happened like two weeks ago.

That's definitely problem. Not a GP so no idea what's up with that. My guess would be they were dealing with something else.  

Posted by David

When someone is able to streak 56 spars straight (breaking the streak record) on godmode in the streak room while 2 GPs are online then yes, it becomes a problem of these people not being banned quickly enough and/or frequently enough. This happened like two weeks ago. Not to mention the person did it two days in a row

I think the hacker claimed that he couldn't get banned, but I'm not sure if that's even possible. I remember reporting him. I just assumed that no one was online to deal with the problem.

Maybe they weren't checking the incoming reports - or were too busy dealing with another problem considering there are usually 4000+ players online. I would've pmed a staff member to check it out, but most of the ones I knew were offline(I did still pm them). The problem is, I don't even know who's a GP these days considering there's no staff list.

But if the two GP were not busy, they should've just took the persons graalid/ gathered evidence and reported it to a higher up if they had difficulty banning him . Maybe they did, who knows. But one things for sure, this thread has gone sort of off topic XD.  

Posted by CM

I never said that. I just said that they keep coming back and the only thing we can do is keep banning them and hope they eventually stop. I didn't say anything about not banning them anymore.

The problem isn't that they're being banned enough. The problem is they keep coming back. Even if there are people dedicated to these areas, people will keep coming back.

What David said.

Posted by CM

Once again, never said that. All systems have flaws. If you have suggestions for how to improve the system, they are appreciated.

You've been given a wide range of suggestions about the PR/GP team in this thread including how you can approach applications (seeking out players in the community who would fit well, as opposed to only reading applications), how you can deal with hackers (having GPs patrolling the arena or hiring someone who spends significant time there), how you can prevent/mitigate abuse or unqualified staff who slip through the cracks (approaches to training, benefits, terminating problem staff, etc), you've had specific situations pointed out to prove these problems exist and how the mentioned solutions will help with said problems.

You're still telling us "you're wrong, but if anybody has any suggestions for us we'd love to hear them", so I'm not sure what to tell you.

Posted by CM

One final word on this topic. GPs have no involvement with that whatsoever. Even if a GP wanted to get involved with that, they probably wouldn't be able to.

Still not talking about code, so not sure why you keep telling me this. As the GP/PR team on iClassic you have total control over GP/PR related issues. Telling me you don't would be like if fp4/Dusty told us they have no control over scripts on the server.

Posted by CM

I'm sure everyone on the staff team would love for all of the hackers to disappear, but unfortunately it doesn't work like that. The best they can do, as you said, is coordinate times, but there are just simply those times when nobody is online to do anything, and sometimes that isn't preventable.

What David said, and also hire someone who spends the majority of their time in the arena.

Posted by CM

For the application process? I haven't seen anything other than "hire people with more gameplay". Like, okay, I'm sure the higher ups would love to hire more players experienced in those aspects of gameplay, but things like ban/account history cannot just simply be overlooked, and that is the way the application process will always be, no matter what shape or form it takes.

Personally, I think there should be a portion of the application that gives situations that the player must respond to. Someone suggested this here and I've been an advocate for the idea because I feel as if it would give an idea of how the player would do in certain situations. Things like "You see your best friend who is an admin adding hats and multiple other items to their player account while nobody else is online", just as an example.

See my note about suggestions above.

Also, I would like to point out that often ban history/account history on iClassic is a result of someone being warned, disconnected, status reset, or banned for something stupid that isn't even really against the rules - which goes right back to hiring responsible, mature, objective people rather than hiring "xXInuyasha360noscope -looking for gf 13 yrs old-" because he's never been banned and then firing him when he throws a temper tantrum over somebody saying they hate Inuyasha and eliminating the person he banned from ever getting a GP job because they were banned.

I'm again not saying that you should ignore account history entirely - there are some disgusting, toxic people on Graal who shouldn't be trusted with anything ever. But there are plenty of people with like a single status reset, or warn, or something stupid for a minor infraction - people who I'm assuming get overlooked based on what you guys have said, and mine and other's experience - who are much more qualified than my previous example.

edit: to be sure, I'm not saying this inuyasha guy actually happened, since I suspect you'll point that out as a counter-argument. But in a less extreme way it seems to be how you guys are approaching running the GP team.

Posted by CM

Yes, the problem exists. Based off of his post I would assume he was terminated from his position, but I don't even know who he isn't so I wouldn't know.

Well, I think we can both reasonably agree that my point was still accurate even if the name behind the point doesn't turn out to be the "success story" I'm referring to.  

Posted by Relic

What David said.



You've been given a wide range of suggestions about the PR/GP team in this thread including how you can approach applications (seeking out players in the community who would fit well, as opposed to only reading applications), how you can deal with hackers (having GPs patrolling the arena or hiring someone who spends significant time there), how you can prevent/mitigate abuse or unqualified staff who slip through the cracks (approaches to training, benefits, terminating problem staff, etc), you've had specific situations pointed out to prove these problems exist and how the mentioned solutions will help with said problems.

You're still telling us if you've received any suggestions you'd love to hear them, so I'm not sure what to tell you.



Still not talking about code, so not sure why you keep telling me this. As the GP/PR team on iClassic you have total control over GP/PR related issues. Telling me you don't would be like if fp4/Dusty told us they have no control over scripts on the server.



What David said and also hire someone who spends the majority of their time in the arena.



I would like to point out that often ban history/account history on iClassic is a result of someone being warned, disconnected, status reset, or banned for something stupid that isn't even really against the rules - which goes right back to hiring responsible, mature, objective people rather than hiring "xXInuyasha360noscope -looking for gf 13 yrs old-" because he's never been banned and then firing him when he throws a temper tantrum over somebody saying they hate Inuyasha and eliminating the person he banned from ever getting a GP job because they were banned.

I'm again not saying that you should ignore account history entirely - there are some disgusting, toxic people on Graal who shouldn't be trusted with anything ever. But there are plenty of people with like a single status reset, or warn, or something stupid for a minor infraction - people who I'm assuming get overlooked based on what you guys have said, and mine and other's experience - who are much more qualified than my previous example.

edit: to be sure, I'm not saying this inuyasha guy actually happened, since I suspect you'll point that out as a counter-argument. But in a less extreme way it seems to be how you guys are approaching running the GP team.


Well, I think we can both reasonably assume that my point was still accurate even if the name behind the point doesn't turn out to be the "success story" I'm referring to.

Just checking in again now. I'm curious as to what actions in the past couple years you guys have seen and considered abusive? I know that the thing you mentioned was an example, but it still reflects an assumption about the GP team many seem to have and I don't see any evidence for it.

That and the "all GPs are 13" deal.. What exactly leads people to believe this? The youngest person on the team is 15 and I don't think you'd ever be able to tell from how they conduct themself unless they directly told you. Granted, they aren't all adults (many, maybe most, are), but being an adult doesn't always mean you're mature.

I can only think of Soren as someone who actually abused their powers in recent times. Granted, I've only been in charge since recently, so some stuff could have escaped me. I still think I pay enough attention that I would have caught it being mentioned here, though?

If you think the beginning of this thread was the result of "abuse", I explained earlier that this wasn't the case. The GP is new and thought that he should warn him even if he was joking about impersonating staff, as was the case.

Since it was a mistake, it won't be held against him. When we're evaluating someone's ban history we check the evidence for bans and warnings to make sure they weren't mistakes that will prevent them from being hired. We don't want to hire someone who has been calling someone racial slurs or impersonating staff to scam accounts for years and hasn't stopped.

I certainly hope you aren't taking half of the posts here at face value, though. If your evidence for abuse is something like "this user said this admin banned him for calling him hawt" then I'd like to mention that nobody here besides staff is held to any standards for what they say and that when I personally look into pretty much anything posted here about someone being banned for "seemingly no reason" it's not true in the slightest. In the future, I'd like to be more open about this but I'm not sure I'm allowed to. We will see.

If you feel the need to, private message me about it and we can talk about potential abuse there.

Dread and I addressed this earlier, but the system isn't perfect and until everyone involved in it is magically endowed with psychic powers, it won't be.

We're looking to improve the situation with spar arenas, and when a hacker gets away with stuff like that we do try to figure out why it might have happened, including talking to gps who were on and could have dealt with it.

A large barrier to communication for staff comes from the fact that we don't allow leaking, so we can't always tell you that there is already something in place or we already take actions to mitigate this or that. If that wasn't as much of an issue, I'm certain people would be a lot more satisfied with how we do things.  

Posted by Relic

You've been given a wide range of suggestions about the PR/GP team in this thread including how you can approach applications [1] (seeking out players in the community who would fit well, as opposed to only reading applications), [2] how you can deal with hackers (having GPs patrolling the arena or hiring someone who spends significant time there), how you can prevent/mitigate abuse or unqualified staff who slip through the cracks (approaches to training, benefits, terminating problem staff, etc), you've had specific situations pointed out to prove these problems exist and how the mentioned solutions will help with said problems.

You're still telling us "you're wrong, but if anybody has any suggestions for us we'd love to hear them", so I'm not sure what to tell you.

1. Issue about this has already been discussed, but to further elaborate, if a person wants to apply for GP then they can apply. The GP staff isn't going to go on a manhunt to find the person best fit for the job. Chances are if somebody didn't apply, they don't want to be hired. I think the main problem is a lack of timezone diversity within the team, which means there are certain hours during the day when nobody is online (usually because they're sleeping).

2. Again, you'll find a hacker in the battle arena like, every two hours, and some days there won't even be any hackers online. Staff already "patrol" the battle arena because reports for other things typically happen there. They can't just sit in the room and watch every single spar, because a) they would probably get bored, and b) there's always something else that needs attention.

3. What you fail to understand is that all of these things already happen during the application process. Again, you can't tell if a person will go rogue in the future. There is a training process for new GPs. If a GP is caught abusing their powers they will be terminated (and possibly have their personal banned depending on the severity on the situation). You just have to work with what you're given based on what they tell you. I'm sure if the GPs had a magic crystal ball that let them see if the applicant would become corrupt, they would use it for every single applicant they received. Unfortunately it doesn't work like that. There's only so much an interviewer can ask a person before they just run out of ways to evaluate the person. At that point it just comes down to what happens in the future with the staff member.

I'm not saying you're wrong at all. Just because I'm pointing out flaws in your own systems doesn't mean they're bad systems. Again, no system is flawless.  

Posted by Jarace

Just checking in again now. I'm curious as to what actions in the past couple years you guys have seen and considered abusive? I know that the thing you mentioned was an example, but it still reflects an assumption about the GP team many seem to have and I don't see any evidence for it.

That and the "all GPs are 13" deal.. What exactly leads people to believe this? The youngest person on the team is 15 and I don't think you'd ever be able to tell from how they conduct themself unless they directly told you. Granted, they aren't all adults (many, maybe most, are), but being an adult doesn't always mean you're mature.

I agree that's It's a long-standing and probably not entirely accurate assumption that people make. There's also the unfortunate point that police forces in the US are dealing with now: a few bad apples tend to make everyone look bad. However, there have been situations where people have been warned, banned, etc for very questionable things.

I can't provide any specific examples unfortunately (I mean normally my situation is a painfully obvious one but that problem is way over the GP team's head), however I believe David and Thallen mentioned a few. Also, most people I and others have spoken to have been victim of or witnessed incidents where somebody says something harmless or something that isn't against the game rules and was immediately disconnected, warned, banned, whatever. If there wasn't some sort of problem there would be no reason for a significant portion of the playerbase to talk about it.

Posted by Jarace

I can only think of Soren as someone who actually abused their powers in recent times. Granted, I've only been in charge since recently, so some stuff could have escaped me. I still think I pay enough attention that I would have caught it being mentioned here, though?

Dark mentioned something just a few posts ago, if you weren't aware of that you might want to look into it. Not commenting on whether he's telling the truth or not, just pointing it out. If It's not true or that's not the whole story you should clear that up since rumors like that tend to spread very fast and give a very negative image.

Posted by Jarace

If you think the beginning of this thread was the result of "abuse", I explained earlier that this wasn't the case. The GP is new and thought that he should warn him even if he was joking about impersonating staff, as was the case.
Since it was a mistake, it won't be held against him. When we're evaluating someone's ban history we check the evidence for bans and warnings to make sure they weren't mistakes that will prevent them from being hired. We don't want to hire someone who has been calling someone racial slurs or impersonating staff to scam accounts for years and hasn't stopped.

Then that's great. And I totally agree that people who have a long, decorated history of breaking rules and being warned/banned shouldn't be trusted in a position of power. However it still stands that the impression players get is that if you've ever been as much as PMed by an admin you can basically forget becoming GP. Like I mentioned earlier (and Thallen/David too,) there were a lot of good candidates from the sparring community alone that were downright ignored except for Fulgore.

Posted by Jarace

I certainly hope you aren't taking half of the posts here at face value, though. If your evidence for abuse is something like "this user said this admin banned him for calling him hawt" then I'd like to mention that nobody here besides staff is held to any standards for what they say and that when I personally look into pretty much anything posted here about someone being banned for "seemingly no reason" it's not true in the slightest. In the future, I'd like to be more open about this but I'm not sure I'm allowed to. We will see.

As I said, I can't comment on any specifics myself because I don't remember, but others have mentioned some recent cases, and many players have stories about that time they or a friend were disconnected/reset/warned/banned for questionable "infractions".

Since Jarace is asking, I'd encourage any player that reads this and knows of a situation let him know about it, since it seems he actually wants to improve the team and its image.

Posted by Jarace

If you feel the need to, private message me about it and we can talk about potential abuse there.

Dread and I addressed this earlier, but the system isn't perfect and until everyone involved in it is magically endowed with psychic powers, it won't be.

We're looking to improve the situation with spar arenas, and when a hacker gets away with stuff like that we do try to figure out why it might have happened, including talking to gps who were on and could have dealt with it.

A large barrier to communication for staff comes from the fact that we don't allow leaking, so we can't always tell you that there is already something in place or we already take actions to mitigate this or that.

Systems will never be perfect, we can definitely both agree there.

There will always be room for improvement if you want to improve. Being more transparent about steps you're taking to improve and being careful about members of your team asking for suggestions while simultaneous dismissing/arguing against every valid suggestion will go a long way towards improving player's attitudes towards you and getting rid of the negative image that is being spread around.

That's something that the whole team and the employees of Toonslab can read and take something from too. Transparency goes a long way - if you want credible examples in the game industry right now here's a few examples to varying degrees:

1) Grinding Gear Games and ALL of their interaction with the Path of Exile community.
2) Stunlock Studios and ALL of their interaction with the Battlerite community.
3) Arena.NET and Riot Games have both run reddit threads relating to their games Guild Wars 2 and League of Legends where admins allowed players to claim their bans were unwarranted and then provided the reasons publically with screenshots and chat logs to counter the claims. This is a little extreme and can be questionable in some cases, but it was a very effective approach to raising player's images of the PR teams within these companies and also provided some good humor.

It's good that you and Dread are actively looking to improve. Take the valid suggestions and do something with them, often the people (especially older players who've been around since early 2000s) making suggestions have as much experience as you guys or more with organizing, running and managing things like this.  

We should all be friends (: Yay friendship amirite?  

Posted by Relic

I agree that's It's a long-standing and probably not entirely accurate assumption that people make. There's also the unfortunate point that police forces in the US are dealing with now: a few bad apples tend to make everyone look bad. However, there have been situations where people have been warned, banned, etc for very questionable things.

I can't provide any specific examples unfortunately (I mean normally my situation is a painfully obvious one but that problem is way over the GP team's head), however I believe David and Thallen mentioned a few. Also, most people I and others have spoken to have been victim of or witnessed incidents where somebody says something harmless or something that isn't against the game rules and was immediately disconnected, warned, banned, whatever. If there wasn't some sort of problem there would be no reason for a significant portion of the playerbase to talk about it.



Dark mentioned something just a few posts ago, if you weren't aware of that you might want to look into it. Not commenting on whether he's telling the truth or not, just pointing it out. If It's not true or that's not the whole story you should clear that up since rumors like that tend to spread very fast and give a very negative image.



Then that's great. And I totally agree that people who have a long, decorated history of breaking rules and being warned/banned shouldn't be trusted in a position of power. However it still stands that the impression players get is that if you've ever been as much as PMed by an admin you can basically forget becoming GP. Like I mentioned earlier (and Thallen/David too,) there were a lot of good candidates from the sparring community alone that were downright ignored except for Fulgore.



As I said, I can't comment on any specifics myself because I don't remember, but others have mentioned some recent cases, and many players have stories about that time they or a friend were disconnected/reset/warned/banned for questionable "infractions".

Since Jarace is asking, I'd encourage any player that reads this and knows of a situation let him know about it, since it seems he actually wants to improve the team and its image.



Systems will never be perfect, we can definitely both agree there.

There will always be room for improvement if you want to improve. Being more transparent about steps you're taking to improve and being careful about members of your team asking for suggestions while simultaneous dismissing/arguing against every valid suggestion will go a long way towards improving player's attitudes towards you and getting rid of the negative image that is being spread around.

That's something that the whole team and the employees of Toonslab can read and take something from too. Transparency goes a long way - if you want credible examples in the game industry right now here's a few examples to varying degrees:

1) Grinding Gear Games and ALL of their interaction with the Path of Exile community.
2) Stunlock Studios and ALL of their interaction with the Battlerite community.
3) Arena.NET and Riot Games have both run reddit threads relating to their games Guild Wars 2 and League of Legends where admins allowed players to claim their bans were unwarranted and then provided the reasons publically with screenshots and chat logs to counter the claims. This is a little extreme and can be questionable in some cases, but it was a very effective approach to raising player's images of the PR teams within these companies and also provided some good humor.

It's good that you and Dread are actively looking to improve. Take the valid suggestions and do something with them, often the people (especially older players who've been around since early 2000s) making suggestions have as much experience as you guys or more with organizing, running and managing things like this.

I looked at Darkk's post, and yeah, that was before I could have caught or done anything about it. I was just a normal GP at the time. She isn't here anymore, though.

No, not every ban in the past has been perfect. But in general, I've seen an improvement over the years in a lot of areas. I didn't include your ban because, as you said, it didn't originate from the GP team.

#3 is something I'm interested in doing, but I would have to get that cleared. I think Albus might have done it once or twice, but that was so long ago I can't remember anymore. I'll read up on the others.

Nobody on the team was asking for advice and dismissing it that I saw. I assume you mean CM, and honestly, I haven't read many of his posts in this thread since it seemed like he was explaining things on our side. He isn't staff at present. If I missed something from a staff member (I think the only other ones in the thread are Milo and Dread) please point it out to me here or in a private message.

There has been some quality discussion here and I'd like to thank everyone that was involved in it by offering constructive criticism thus far. Dread and are always looking for ways to improve. It might not be obvious that we have worked on a lot of the stuff mentioned here prior to now, but it is happening.

To anyone who hasn't applied until now because they're worried about old bans weighing them down, please apply anyway if you're interested. The worst that happens is you don't get a response. And in case this also needs to be cleared up,(I figured this was a given, but I suppose it must be said) game experience is a must, and if you have lots of it your application will stand out.  

I've had a couple of bad experiences with GPs in the past, I'll mention them if I feel they'd be relevant in the thread, but it's these experiences that made my ban history look like an encyclopedia (6 bans, last one was over a year ago)
Anyway Jarace's post looks promising and made me wanna apply as I have tons of game experience  

Posted by Jarace

I looked at Darkk's post, and yeah, that was before I could have caught or done anything about it. I was just a normal GP at the time. She isn't here anymore, though.

No, not every ban in the past has been perfect. But in general, I've seen an improvement over the years in a lot of areas. I didn't include your ban because, as you said, it didn't originate from the GP team.

#3 is something I'm interested in doing, but I would have to get that cleared. I think Albus might have done it once or twice, but that was so long ago I can't remember anymore. I'll read up on the others.

Nobody on the team was asking for advice and dismissing it that I saw. I assume you mean CM, and honestly, I haven't read many of his posts in this thread since it seemed like he was explaining things on our side. He isn't staff at present. If I missed something from a staff member (I think the only other ones in the thread are Milo and Dread) please point it out to me here or in a private message.

There has been some quality discussion here and I'd like to thank everyone that was involved in it by offering constructive criticism thus far. Dread and are always looking for ways to improve. It might not be obvious that we have worked on a lot of the stuff mentioned here prior to now, but it is happening.

To anyone who hasn't applied until now because they're worried about old bans weighing them down, please apply anyway if you're interested. The worst that happens is you don't get a response. And in case this also needs to be cleared up,(I figured this was a given, but I suppose it must be said) game experience is a must, and if you have lots of it your application will stand out.

My mistake, CM seemed to be implying he was a member of the team by the way he was writing. Either way my points still stand but it seems like you're listening to them and other people's and seeing what improvements you can make so good on you.