Dark the same guy who showed a information day pamphlet as "proof" he is in university.


Same guy who tells me to stop "making fun of jimbo because it's immature" then he goes ahead and stalks the guy whenever he sees fit.

Same guy who makes fun of people for having an online relationship when he was rejected while attempting to get into an online relationship.

Starting to see this weird trend of hypocrisy from someone whose studying law?????

Man I'd love to see what your essays and case studies are like, I'm sure using the first website that comes up on google gets you a "97.5 atar"  

Posted by Darkk

Also aren't most animals less intelligent in comparison to us? Doubt they can distinguish the sex of each other

 

Posted by Red

Dark the same guy who showed a information day pamphlet as "proof" he is in university.

If it really bothers you (idk why it would) on whether I attend university or not, i'll send you one of my case studies when I'm home (currently overseas.) A snapchat of me in a lecture?

Posted by Red

Same guy who makes fun of people for having an online relationship when he was rejected while attempting to get into an online relationship.

Who? If it's that sour rumour it's false. But sure, go ahead and believe the same kids who devote hours of their day to roleplay as pirates lol  

Posted by Darkk

Me trying to trigger gays on this thread resulted in an argument about animal sex, im out lol

How petty. You are a bully. Thread should be deleted. You made a complete fool out of yourself in this thread.  

This guy goes to university?

What a waste.  

Posted by 5hift

This guy goes to university?

What a waste.

money can get you anything apparently  

Posted by Darlene

How petty. You are a bully. Thread should be deleted. You made a complete fool out of yourself in this thread.

Minus my comments, It's actually a constructive thread. Very intelligent idea Darling, just delete the entire thread because of one person lol...

If I took the forums seriously (god bless whoever actually does) I'd be less controversial and say something logical which is if two people love each other they should be allowed to marry one another regardless of gender  

So basically you admit to just ****posting? Yeah ok, enjoy your ban.  

The argument that animals involve themselves in homosexual behaviour is pretty weak imo. Some animals are incest, that doesn't mean incest is natural or morally correct.

Posted by Darkk

If two people love each other they should be allowed to marry one another regardless of gender

The same thing about incest could apply here. If a father and his daughter both love each other, and both are consensual, should they be allowed to marry each other?

I'm not saying that homosexuality is unnatural or anything like that. I'm just commenting on the arguments used.  

Posted by Darkk

Minus my comments, It's actually a constructive thread.

Almost all posts past page two are in reply to you, who was admittedly purposefully controversial and not taking it serious. How is that a constructive thread? You already said you "weren't replying again" a few replies ago, so maybe cut your losses and get out of here?  

Posted by Hadi

The argument that animals involve themselves in homosexual behaviour is pretty weak imo. Some animals are incest, that doesn't mean incest is natural or morally correct.


The same thing about incest could apply here. If a father and his daughter both love each other, and both are consensual, should they be allowed to marry each other?

I'm not saying that homosexuality is unnatural or anything like that. I'm just commenting on the arguments used.

We're not saying that animals just have gay sex on a whim. We're saying that it is possible for homosexual activity to occur in nature and for a reason. To say that it isn't "natural" is completely dismissive of nature's ability to break borders.

Also humans have inbred themselves for several hundred years, not saying that it isn't bad but it happens.

There was absolutely nothing controversial about Darkk's posts. Just a lousy excuse to harass some people for kicks I'm kinda sad I didn't notice how blatant his trolling was earlier.  

Posted by Darkk

Minus my comments, It's actually a constructive thread. Very intelligent idea Darling, just delete the entire thread because of one person lol...

If I took the forums seriously (god bless whoever actually does) I'd be less controversial and say something logical which is if two people love each other they should be allowed to marry one another regardless of gender

You admittedly only made the thread to start something. People like you should not even be allowed to post on a forum, unless it is one for trolls.  

Posted by 5hift

There was absolutely nothing controversial about Darkk's posts. Just a lousy excuse to harass some people for kicks I'm kinda sad I didn't notice how blatant his trolling was earlier.

Why is everyone buying this troll excuse??? He clearly was just ****ing stupid, finally realized it, and came up with a quick believable excuse that someone on the internet could make. Trolling my ass.  

i was talking about how ben & jerry's banned two scoops of the same flavour in australia in protest over gay marriage ,, how is this about incest and gay animals doing it now..

& @dark stop acting like you don't care about graalians.com just cus you lost the argument to colin ╮(︶▽︶)╭..  

Posted by PigParty

Why is everyone buying this troll excuse??? He clearly was just ****ing stupid, finally realized it, and came up with a quick believable excuse that someone on the internet could make. Trolling my ass.

Lol I'm saying this idiot just admitted to harassing people for no reason which is a banable offense.